Neuropathological features of antemortem atrophy‐based subtypes of Alzheimer’s disease

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

AbstractBackgroundPure Alzheimer’s disease (AD), characterized by combined amyloid and tau pathology, is not the most prevalent form of the disease as non‐AD pathologies (e.g., alpha‐synuclein and TDP‐43) are commonly observed postmortem. The role of AD and non‐AD pathologies is unclear in relation to disease heterogeneity. Therefore, we investigated whether antemortem MRI‐based atrophy subtypes of AD differ in postmortem neuropathological features and comorbid non‐AD pathologies.MethodsWe selected individuals from the ADNI with antemortem MRI evaluating brain atrophy within 2 years before death; antemortem diagnosis of AD dementia/mild cognitive impairment; and a postmortem‐confirmed AD neuropathologic change. Antemortem atrophy subtypes were modeled as continuous phenomena using a recent conceptual framework: typicality (spanning limbic predominant AD to hippocampal sparing AD) and severity (spanning typical AD to minimal atrophy AD). Postmortem neuropathological evaluation included AD hallmarks (amyloid‐beta, tau), non‐AD pathologies (alpha‐synuclein, TDP‐43) and concomitant pathological burden. Partial correlations assessed the associations between antemortem atrophy subtype dimensions and postmortem neuropathological outcomes.ResultsIn 31 individuals (mean age = 80y, 26% females), antemortem typicality was significantly associated with neuropathological features: amyloid‐beta (rho = ‐0.39 overall), tau (rho = ‐0.38 regionally), neuritic plaque density (rho = ‐0.4 overall), alpha‐synuclein (rho = ‐0.39 regionally), TDP‐43 (rho = ‐0.49 overall), and concomitance pathological burden (rho = ‐0.59 regionally). This suggests that limbic predominant AD was associated with higher burden of these pathologies compared to hippocampal sparing AD. Antemortem severity was significantly associated with concomitant pathological burden (rho = ‐0.43 regionally), such that typical AD showed higher burden than minimal atrophy AD.ConclusionsBased on our direct antemortem‐to‐postmortem validation, we hypothesize that: (a) typicality and severity in atrophy reflect differential aspects of susceptibility of the brain to AD and non‐AD pathologies; (b) limbic predominant AD and typical AD subtypes may share similar biological pathways, making them more vulnerable to the investigated AD and non‐AD pathologies compared to hippocampal sparing AD, which may follow a different biological pathway. Our findings provide a deeper understanding of associations of atrophy subtypes in AD with different pathologies, enhancing prevailing knowledge of biological heterogeneity in AD.