Abstract

Neurons in animal visual systems that respond to global optic flow exhibit selectivity for motion direction and/or velocity. The avian lentiformis mesencephali (LM), known in mammals as the nucleus of the optic tract (NOT), is a key nucleus for global motion processing [1-4]. In all animals tested, it has been found that the majority of LM and NOT neurons aretuned to temporo-nasal (back-to-front) motion [4-11]. Moreover, the monocular gain of the optokinetic response is higher in this direction, compared to naso-temporal (front-to-back) motion [12, 13]. Hummingbirds are sensitive to small visual perturbations while hovering, and they drift to compensate for optic flow in all directions [14]. Interestingly, the LM, but not other visual nuclei, is hypertrophied in hummingbirds relative to other birds [15], which suggests enhanced perception of global visual motion. Using extracellular recording techniques, we found that there is a uniform distribution of preferred directions in the LM in Anna's hummingbirds, whereas zebra finch and pigeon LM populations, as in other tetrapods, show a strong bias toward temporo-nasal motion. Furthermore, LM and NOT neurons are generally classified as tuned to "fast" or "slow" motion [10, 16, 17], and we predicted that most neurons would be tuned to slow visual motion as an adaptation for slow hovering. However, we found the opposite result: most hummingbird LM neurons are tuned to fast pattern velocities, compared to zebra finches and pigeons. Collectively, these results suggest a role in rapid responses during hovering, as well as in velocity control and collision avoidance during forward flight of hummingbirds.

Highlights

  • We first identified the preferred direction of lentiformis mesencephali (LM) neurons by presenting visual motion in each of eight directions, 45 apart

  • The current study demonstrates that hummingbird LM neurons deviate strongly from the tetrapod pattern by having no directional bias at the population level (Figure 2)

  • Other previous studies, which used random dot-fields in pigeons, classified 82% of measured LM cells as ‘‘fast’’ (>6/s) and 18% as ‘‘slow’’ (

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We first identified the preferred direction of LM neurons by presenting visual motion in each of eight directions, 45 apart. Each motion stimulus lasted 5 s and was bounded by 5 s pauses. Raw extracellular recordings are shown for one hummingbird cell during a full trial (Figure 1A) and two zebra finch cells during a portion of a trial, with higher temporal resolution (Figure 1D). Single units were isolated offline using amplitude or template spike sorting (Figures 1E, 1F, and S1B; see Supplemental Experimental Procedures)

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.