Abstract

Discriminating between object categories (e.g., conspecifics, food, potential predators) is a critical function of the primate and bird visual systems. We examined whether a similar hierarchical organization in the ventral stream that operates for processing faces in monkeys also exists in the avian visual system. We performed electrophysiological recordings from the pigeon Wulst of the thalamofugal pathway, in addition to the entopallium (ENTO) and mesopallium ventrolaterale (MVL) of the tectofugal pathway, while pigeons viewed images of faces, scrambled controls, and sine gratings. A greater proportion of MVL neurons fired to the stimuli, and linear discriminant analysis revealed that the population response of MVL neurons distinguished between the stimuli with greater capacity than ENTO and Wulst neurons. While MVL neurons displayed the greatest response selectivity, in contrast to the primate system no neurons were strongly face-selective and some responded best to the scrambled images. These findings suggest that MVL is primarily involved in processing the local features of images, much like the early visual cortex.

Highlights

  • IntroductionDiscriminating between object categories (e.g., conspecifics, food, potential predators) is a critical function of the primate and bird visual systems

  • Discriminating between object categories is a critical function of the primate and bird visual systems

  • In ENTO we found a greater proportion of 53 inhibitory (61%) compared with 35 excitatory (39%) neurons, whereas we found a greater proportion of 58 excitatory (75%) compared with 19 inhibitory (25%) neurons in mesopallium ventrolaterale (MVL)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Discriminating between object categories (e.g., conspecifics, food, potential predators) is a critical function of the primate and bird visual systems. While MVL neurons displayed the greatest response selectivity, in contrast to the primate system no neurons were strongly face-selective and some responded best to the scrambled images These findings suggest that MVL is primarily involved in processing the local features of images, much like the early visual cortex. The tectofugal pathway is thought to be primarily involved in identification of objects in the area dorsalis (a second fovea region) of the frontal visual ­field[17, 18]. A recent study using linear discriminant analysis (LDA)[20] demonstrated that a small population of MVL neurons can discriminate between the features of animate and inanimate objects with greater capacity than at the level of ENTO. The purpose of the current study was to assess whether neurons in the pigeon visual system might show selectivity for faces, despite the evolutionary separation and differences in brain organisation from mammals

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.