Abstract

were right-handed and 31.3% had the dominant leg involved in the procedure. For the peak torque variable, the results for the involved and uninvolved knees were 258.67 � 40.75 Nm and 338.71 � 1.79 Nm at 60 � /s, respectively (p ¼0.92); and 143.33 � 25.12 Nm and 203.59 � 213.22 Nm at 300 � /s, respectively (p ¼0.27). For the activation of VMO, the results for the involved and uninvolved knees were 219.65 � 210.25 mV and 220.86 � 209.00 m Va t 60 � /s, respectively (p ¼0.98); and 215.29 � 210.71 mV and 216.00 � 209.33 m Va t300 � /s,respectively (p ¼0.99). There was nostatisticaldifference (p ¼0.39) between the NMEof both knees during knee extension at 60 � /s, with 1.00 � 0.76 mV/N m for the involved knee and 0.81 � 0.43 mV/N m for the uninvolved knee. There was no statisticaldifference(p ¼0.20)between the NMEofbothknees duringkneeextensionat300 � /s,with 1.07 � 0.26mV/N m forthe involvedkneeand0.96 � 0.21 mV/N m for the uninvolved knee. Conclusions: There was no difference in the neuromuscular efficiency of the VMO following ACL reconstruction in professional soccer athletes 4–6 months

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.