Abstract

Sedation is a ubiquitous practice in ICUs and NCCUs. It has the benefit of reducing cerebral energy demands, but also precludes an accurate neurologic assessment. Because of this, sedation is intermittently stopped for the purposes of a neurologic assessment, which is termed a neurologic wake-up test (NWT). NWTs are considered to be the gold-standard in continued assessment of brain-injured patients under sedation. NWTs also produce an acute stress response that is accompanied by elevations in blood pressure, respiratory rate, heart rate, and ICP. Utilization of cerebral microdialysis and brain tissue oxygen monitoring in small cohorts of brain-injured patients suggests that this is not mirrored by alterations in cerebral metabolism, and seldom affects oxygenation. The hard contraindications for the NWT are preexisting intracranial hypertension, barbiturate treatment, status epilepticus, and hyperthermia. However, hemodynamic instability, sedative use for primary ICP control, and sedative use for severe agitation or respiratory distress are considered significant safety concerns. Despite ubiquitous recommendation, it is not clear if additional clinically relevant information is gleaned through its use, especially with the contemporaneous utilization of multimodality monitoring. Various monitoring modalities provide unique and pertinent information about neurologic function, however, their role in improving patient outcomes and guiding treatment plans has not been fully elucidated. There is a paucity of information pertaining to the optimal frequency of NWTs, and if it differs based on type of injury. Only one concrete recommendation was found in the literature, exemplifying the uncertainty surrounding its utility. The most common sedative used and recommended is propofol because of its rapid onset, short duration, and reduction of cerebral energy requirements. Dexmedetomidine may be employed to facilitate serial NWTs, and should always be used in the non-intubated patient or if propofol infusion syndrome (PRIS) develops. Midazolam is not recommended due to tissue accumulation and residual sedation confounding a reliable NWT. Thus, NWTs are well-tolerated in selected patients and remain recommended as the gold-standard for continued neuromonitoring. Predicated upon one expert panel, they should be performed at least one time per day. Propofol or dexmedetomidine are the main sedative choices, both enabling a rapid awakening and consistent NWT.

Highlights

  • There is widespread use of sedation for patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) and neurocritical care unit (NCCU)

  • The few recommendations on the subject suggest using propofol to facilitate a smoother transition toward the neurologic wake-up test (NWT), with careful attention paid to the development of propofol infusion syndrome (PRIS), and ensuring infusion rates remain < 4 mg/kg/h unless for bolus intracranial pressure (ICP) control

  • The existing literature indicates that dexmedetomidine can be safely and efficaciously used for brain-injured patients, and its rapid onset and short half-life devoid of residual tissue accumulation make it a very attractive choice to facilitate serial NWTs

Read more

Summary

Neurologic Assessment of the Neurocritical Care Patient

Neurologic Assessment of the Neurocritical Care Patient. NWTs are considered to be the gold-standard in continued assessment of brain-injured patients under sedation. Hemodynamic instability, sedative use for primary ICP control, and sedative use for severe agitation or respiratory distress are considered significant safety concerns. Despite ubiquitous recommendation, it is not clear if additional clinically relevant information is gleaned through its use, especially with the contemporaneous utilization of multimodality monitoring. Various monitoring modalities provide unique and pertinent information about neurologic function, their role in improving patient outcomes and guiding treatment plans has not been fully elucidated. NWTs are well-tolerated in selected patients and remain recommended as the gold-standard for continued neuromonitoring.

INTRODUCTION
MULTIMODALITY NEUROMONITORING
Optic Ultrasound
Regional CBF
Brain Injury Biomarkers
Combination Monitoring
Multimodality Neuromonitoring Conclusion
THE NWT
NWT Safety
Does the NWT Provide Clinical Information?
NWT Conclusion
DIS protocols generally reduced ICU
IS THERE AN OPTIMAL FREQUENCY OF PERFORMING NWTS?
CHOICE OF SEDATIVE
Sedative Conclusion
Findings
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call