Abstract
Amodal completion is the phenomenon of perceiving completed objects even though physically they are partially occluded. In this review, we provide an extensive overview of the results obtained from a variety of neuroimaging studies on the neural correlates of amodal completion. We discuss whether low-level and high-level cortical areas are implicated in amodal completion; provide an overview of how amodal completion unfolds over time while dissociating feedforward, recurrent, and feedback processes; and discuss how amodal completion is represented at the neuronal level. The involvement of low-level visual areas such as V1 and V2 is not yet clear, while several high-level structures such as the lateral occipital complex and fusiform face area seem invariant to occlusion of objects and faces, respectively, and several motor areas seem to code for object permanence. The variety of results on the timing of amodal completion hints to a mixture of feedforward, recurrent, and feedback processes. We discuss whether the invisible parts of the occluded object are represented as if they were visible, contrary to a high-level representation. While plenty of questions on amodal completion remain, this review presents an overview of the neuroimaging findings reported to date, summarizes several insights from computational models, and connects research of other perceptual completion processes such as modal completion. In all, it is suggested that amodal completion is the solution to deal with various types of incomplete retinal information, and highly depends on stimulus complexity and saliency, and therefore also give rise to a variety of observed neural patterns.
Highlights
We live in a complex world full of objects that are hidden by other objects
We have provided an overview of the neuroimaging literature on amodal completion
This table includes all studies in the field of amodal completion in which an attempt was made to unravel the neural dynamics of amodal completion
Summary
We live in a complex world full of objects that are (partly) hidden by other objects. In natural situations, we encounter many more partially occluded or temporarily hidden objects than fully visible objects. We do not perceive these occluded objects as incomplete, fragmented, and unrelated, but rather as complete, consistent, coherent, and whole objects. We seem to be unaware of this fragmented reality surrounding us and take for granted the completed reality that our brain creates. The brain is capable of constructing a completed representation of incomplete retinal images. This inverse problem is ill-posed due to its incompleteness and subject to an infinite amount of possible completions. Our brain fills in the incomplete parts of occluded objects effortlessly and does so within a split second
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.