Neuroimaging and Neurological Outcomes in Perinatal Arterial Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract

BackgroundPrediction of outcomes in perinatal arterial ischemic stroke (PAIS) is challenging. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether infarct characteristics can predict outcomes in PAIS. MethodsA systematic search was conducted using five databases in January 2023. Studies were included if the sample included children with neonatal or presumed PAIS; if infarct size, location, or laterality was indicated; and if at least one motor, cognitive, or language outcome was reported. The level of evidence and risk of bias were evaluated using the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions tool. Meta-analyses were conducted comparing infarct size or location with neurological outcomes when at least three studies could be analyzed. ResultsEighteen full-text articles were included in a systematic review with nine included in meta-analysis. Meta-analyses revealed that small strokes were associated with a lower risk of cerebral palsy/hemiplegia compared with large strokes (risk ratio [RR] = 0.263, P = 0.001) and a lower risk of epilepsy (RR = 0.182, P < 0.001). Middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarcts were not associated with a significantly different risk of cerebral palsy/hemiplegia compared with non-MCA strokes (RR = 1.220, P = 0.337). Bilateral infarcts were associated with a 48% risk of cerebral palsy/hemiplegia, a 26% risk of epilepsy, and a 58% risk of cognitive impairment. ConclusionsLarger stroke size was associated with worse outcomes across multiple domains. Widely heterogeneous reporting of infarct characteristics and outcomes limits the comparison of studies and the analysis of outcomes. More consistent reporting of infarct characteristics and outcomes will be important to advance research in this field.