Neurodegenerative Pathways in Alzheimer's Disease Subtypes

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundBiological heterogeneity in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has been observed and described as subtypes in measures of neurodegeneration (e.g., hypometabolism and atrophy). However, the relationship between these AD subtypes have not been studied. Thus, we aimed to compare and identify pathways associated with hypometabolism‐based and atrophy‐based subtypes.MethodCross‐sectional FDG‐PET and MRI scans from 173 amyloid‐positive AD individuals and 120 amyloid‐negative cognitively normal control individuals from the ADNI were included. Subtypes were identified in each neuroimaging modality by random forest hierarchical clustering using FDG‐PET uptake (measuring hypometabolism) and MRI volumes (measuring atrophy) in cortical and subcortical regions. We performed cross‐modal comparisons of atrophy patterns in hypometabolism‐based subtypes and hypometabolism patterns in atrophy‐based subtypes. To identify neurodegenerative pathways corresponding to each subtype, we used event‐based modelling to predict sequential progression of abnormality in hypometabolism and atrophy across brain regions (hippocampus, AD signature, frontal, posterior areas).ResultClustering revealed four hypometabolism‐based (two relatively limbic‐predominant: 25.7%, 19.8% and two relatively cortical‐predominant: 25.7%, 28.6%) and three atrophy‐based (diffuse: 18.7%, relatively limbic‐predominant: 28.6%, minimal: 52.6%) subtypes of AD with distinct spatial patterns and demographic and clinical characteristics. Cross‐modally, we found comparable AD‐typical atrophy patterns (involving the hippocampus and temporal regions) across the four hypometabolism‐based subtypes and comparable AD‐typical hypometabolism patterns (involving the retrosplenial cortex) across the three atrophy‐based subtypes. Event‐based modelling showed that each hypometabolism‐based subtype was associated with a unique sequential progression of regional hypometabolism, but not regional atrophy (sequence always initiated with frontal atrophy across all subtypes). Similarly, each atrophy‐based subtype was associated with a unique sequential progression of regional atrophy, but not regional hypometabolism (sequence always initiated with hypometabolism in AD signature areas across all subtypes).ConclusionOur findings suggest that hypometabolism‐based and atrophy‐based AD subtypes are not interchangeable. We identified unique metabolic and atrophy pathways specific to each subtype, which supports the notion that neurodegeneration manifests and progresses differentially across subtypes of AD. Despite being measures of neurodegeneration, hypometabolism and atrophy may not share the same extent of heterogeneity, bearing a complex multimodal relationship. Disentangling such relationships and combining complementary biomarkers to investigate heterogeneity could aid personalized treatment of AD.