Abstract
Working memory (WM) impairments in ADHD have been consistently reported along with deficits in attentional control. Yet, it is not clear which specific WM processes are affected in this condition. A deficient coupling between attention and WM has been reported. Nevertheless, most studies focus on the capacity to retain information rather than on the attention-dependent stages of encoding and retrieval. The current study uses a visual short-term memory binding task, measuring both behavioral and electrophysiological responses to characterize WM encoding, binding and retrieval comparing ADHD and non-ADHD matched adolescents. ADHD exhibited poorer accuracy and larger reaction times than non-ADHD on all conditions but especially when a change across encoding and test displays occurred. Binding manipulation affected equally both groups. Encoding P3 was larger in the non-ADHD group. Retrieval P3 discriminated change only in the non-ADHD group. Binding-dependent ERP modulations did not reveal group differences. Encoding and retrieval P3 were significantly correlated only in non-ADHD. These results suggest that while binding processes seem to be intact in ADHD, attention-related encoding and retrieval processes are compromised, resulting in a failure in the prioritization of relevant information. This new evidence can also inform recent theories of binding in visual WM.
Highlights
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a highly prevalent neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by attentional difficulties, hyperactivity and impulsivity[1,2,3]
It would be highly desirable to further investigate visual Working Memory (WM) binding in individuals with attentional disorders, such as those diagnosed with ADHD
We found a poorer overall performance and larger reaction times (RTs) in ADHD versus non-ADHD participants
Summary
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a highly prevalent neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by attentional difficulties, hyperactivity and impulsivity[1,2,3]. WM is defined as a limited-capacity system responsible for encoding, retaining or maintaining, and manipulating cognitive representations of stimuli Such memory system encompasses independent phonological (PH) and visuospatial (VS) subsystems, and a central executive (CE) component, responsible for the attentional control. The evidence gathered to date suggests that binding of features in visual WM requires no more attentional resources than processing individual features. The consistency of these findings across a thorough experimental series, led Allan Baddeley to revise the WM model[20]. Metanalytic studies suggest that processes such as executive attention, working memory, along with decision making factors like motivation and reward are central to understand the ADHD cognitive profile[21]. ADHD subtype (predominantly Inattentive or Combined) seems to have no significant effect on WM dysfunction, perhaps due to their shared inattention symptomatology[24,25]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
