Neuro Endoscopic Vs Craniotomy approach in Supratentorial hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage: An updated Meta-analysis

Abstract

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a serious medical condition associated with high mortality and disability rates. Surgical interventions, including neuro-endoscopic surgery (NES) and craniotomy, are employed to manage ICH and improve patient outcomes. This meta-analysis compares the effectiveness of NES versus craniotomy in treating ICH. A systematic literature search was conducted to identify relevant studies comparing NES with craniotomy for ICH. Inclusion criteria encompassed primary or secondary results from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or observational studies (OSs) with confirmed supratentorial ICH. Data were extracted, and methodological quality was assessed using appropriate tools. Statistical analysis was performed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis. Twenty-six studies (n=3237 patients) were included in the analysis. NES was associated with significantly lower mortality compared to craniotomy (OR: 0.45, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.60, p < 0.00001). Hematoma evacuation rates were higher with NES (SDM: 1.505, 95% CI 0.835 to 2.160, p < 0.00001). NES also showed better functional outcomes (OR: 3.31, 95% CI 1.78 to 6.17, p = 0.0002) and reduced blood loss (SDM: -3.06, 95% CI -3.979 to -2.141, p = 0.000). Additionally, NES was associated with shorter hospital and ICU stays, shorter operative times, and fewer complications such as infection and rebleeding. NES emerges as a promising alternative to craniotomy for treating ICH, offering advantages in terms of mortality reduction, improved functional outcomes, and fewer complications. Future studies should explore advancements in neuro-endoscopic techniques to optimize patient outcomes further.