Abstract
BackgroundCesarean delivery is the most common surgical procedure performed in the USA. We evaluated the postoperative analgesic properties of neuraxial hydromorphone compared to neuraxial morphine for post-cesarean delivery analgesia. MethodsA retrospective chart review was performed of women who underwent cesarean delivery and received neuraxial anesthesia from March to November 2011 and from March to November 2012. A total of 450 patients received intrathecal morphine 200μg and 387 patients received intrathecal hydromorphone 60μg. Eighty-one patients received epidural morphine 3mg and 102 patients received epidural hydromorphone 0.6mg. ResultsMedian time to first opioid after intrathecal morphine was 17.0h versus 14.6h after intrathecal hydromorphone (P<0.0001). Patients who received intrathecal hydromorphone consumed more opioids in the first 24h; 37.0mg versus 26.4mg oral morphine equivalents (P<0.001). The side effect profile between the intrathecal groups was similar. Median time to first opioid with epidural morphine was 20.1h versus 13.0h with epidural hydromorphone (P=0.0007). Total opioid consumption was not significantly different between the epidural groups. The side effect profiles were similar. ConclusionsHydromorphone is a reasonable alternative to morphine for post-cesarean delivery analgesia. With the dosing used in our study, analgesia from morphine lasted longer than hydromorphone via intrathecal and epidural routes; however, neuraxial hydromorphone remains a reasonable option for long-acting analgesia post cesarean delivery.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
