Abstract

Introduction: Advantageous effects of biological motion (BM) detection, a low-perceptual mechanism that allows the rapid recognition and understanding of spatiotemporal characteristics of movement via salient kinematics information, can be amplified when combined with motor imagery (MI), i.e., the mental simulation of motor acts. According to Jeannerod’s neurostimulation theory, asynchronous firing and reduction of mu and beta rhythm oscillations, referred to as suppression over the sensorimotor area, are sensitive to both MI and action observation (AO) of BM. Yet, not many studies investigated the use of BM stimuli using combined AO-MI tasks. In this study, we assessed the neural response in the form of event-related synchronization and desynchronization (ERD/S) patterns following the observation of point-light-walkers and concordant MI, as compared to MI alone.Methods: Twenty right-handed healthy participants accomplished the experimental task by observing BM stimuli and subsequently performing the same movement using kinesthetic MI (walking, cycling, and jumping conditions). We recorded an electroencephalogram (EEG) with 32 channels and performed time-frequency analysis on alpha (8–13 Hz) and beta (18–24 Hz) frequency bands during the MI task. A two-way repeated-measures ANOVA was performed to test statistical significance among conditions and electrodes of interest.Results: The results revealed significant ERD/S patterns in the alpha frequency band between conditions and electrode positions. Post hoc comparisons showed significant differences between condition 1 (walking) and condition 3 (jumping) over the left primary motor cortex. For the beta band, a significantly less difference in ERD patterns (p < 0.01) was detected only between condition 3 (jumping) and condition 4 (reference).Discussion: Our results confirmed that the observation of BM combined with MI elicits a neural suppression, although just in the case of jumping. This is in line with previous findings of AO and MI (AOMI) eliciting a neural suppression for simulated whole-body movements. In the last years, increasing evidence started to support the integration of AOMI training as an adjuvant neurorehabilitation tool in Parkinson’s disease (PD).Conclusion: We concluded that using BM stimuli in AOMI training could be promising, as it promotes attention to kinematic features and imitative motor learning.

Highlights

  • Advantageous effects of biological motion (BM) detection, a lowperceptual mechanism that allows the rapid recognition and understanding of spatiotemporal characteristics of movement via salient kinematics information, can be amplified when combined with motor imagery (MI), i.e., the mental simulation of motor acts

  • Since parallel findings among Parkinson’s disease (PD) and healthy participants in the ability to image kinesthetic movements of a hand after observation have been found (Bek et al, 2019), our findings suggest that training based on after combined training (AOMI) of complex movements could strengthen patients’ synaptic transmission, improve balance, coordination and muscle strength (Abbruzzese et al, 2016; Abbruzzese and Pelosin, 2018; Scott et al, 2021)

  • The observation of BM of a complex act combined with MI, as in the case of jumping, induced a mu and beta suppression over the Rolandic area compared to the other types of movements and MI alone

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Advantageous effects of biological motion (BM) detection, a lowperceptual mechanism that allows the rapid recognition and understanding of spatiotemporal characteristics of movement via salient kinematics information, can be amplified when combined with motor imagery (MI), i.e., the mental simulation of motor acts. It is an advantageous mechanism that allows the brain to recognize purposeful movements and social cues (e.g., direction, gender, and emotions) very rapidly (Beintema and Lappe, 2002; Gao et al, 2015; Lu et al, 2016; Wang et al, 2018). It draws the attention of the observer to the kinematic aspects of movements and not to the unrelated elements of the action, such as the face or emotional expressions (Mezzarobba et al, 2021). BM triggers and spontaneously primes imitation of kinematic movements (Mather et al, 1992; Bienkiewicz et al, 2013), promoting motor learning (Abbruzzese and Pelosin, 2018)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call