Abstract

Predictive coding theories argue that deviance detection phenomena, such as mismatch responses and omission responses, are generated by predictive processes with possibly overlapping neural substrates. Molecular imaging and electrophysiology studies of mismatch responses and corollary discharge in the rodent model allowed the development of mechanistic and computational models of these phenomena. These models enable translation between human and non-human animal research and help to uncover fundamental features of change-processing microcircuitry in the neocortex. This microcircuitry is characterized by stimulus-specific adaptation and feedforward inhibition of stimulus-selective populations of pyramidal neurons and interneurons, with specific contributions from different interneuron types. The overlap of the substrates of different types of responses to deviant stimuli remains to be understood. Omission responses, which are observed both in corollary discharge and mismatch response protocols in humans, are underutilized in animal research and may be pivotal in uncovering the substrates of predictive processes. Omission studies comprise a range of methods centered on the withholding of an expected stimulus. This review aims to provide an overview of omission protocols and showcase their potential to integrate and complement the different models and procedures employed to study prediction and deviance detection.This approach may reveal the biological foundations of core concepts of predictive coding, and allow an empirical test of the framework’s promise to unify theoretical models of attention and perception.

Highlights

  • The ability to learn associations between stimuli and behavior is the main selective pressure on central nervous systems across species and appears to be among the core functions of the neocortex (Badcock et al, 2019)

  • This review provides a perspective on the compatibility of such models, at the substrate and mechanistic level provided by animal research, with a focus on the contribution of omission studies to our understanding of predictive mechanisms

  • Model-mediated interaction between human and animal research is informative concerning the cortical generators of Mismatch Negativity (MMN) and corollary discharge

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The ability to learn associations between stimuli and behavior is the main selective pressure on central nervous systems across species and appears to be among the core functions of the neocortex (Badcock et al, 2019). Omission responses obtained by employing slow-rhythm and non-rhythmic protocols require either an attention-driven increase in neuronal gain (Motz et al, 2013; Hernández and Hernández-Sánchez, 2017), multimodal projections to local circuitry (McIntosh et al, 1998; Nittono, 2005; den Ouden et al, 2009; SanMiguel et al, 2013a,b; Stekelenburg and Vroomen, 2015; van Laarhoven et al, 2017, 2020; Dercksen et al, 2020), or other forms of naturalistic (Lehmann et al, 2016) or behavioral relevance (Woerd et al, 2017; Aitken et al, 2020) of the omitted stimulus, in order to be detectable. This hypothesis was presented by Chien et al (2019) in the framework of a computational model

A COMPUTATIONAL MODEL OF CIRCUITRY SUPPORTING DEVIANCE DETECTION
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call