Abstract

The judgments of moral goodness and moral beauty objectively refer to the perception and evaluation of moral traits, which are generally influenced by facial attractiveness. For centuries, people have equated beauty with the possession of positive qualities, but it is not clear whether the association between beauty and positive qualities exerts a similarly implicit influence on people's responses to moral goodness and moral beauty, how it affects those responses, and what is the neural basis for such an effect. The present study is the first to examine the neural responses to facial attractiveness in the judgments of moral goodness and moral beauty. We found that beautiful faces in both moral judgments activated the left ventral occipitotemporal cortices sensitive to the geometric configuration of the faces, demonstrating that both moral goodness and moral beauty required the automatic visual analysis of geometrical configuration of attractive faces. In addition, compared to beautiful faces during moral goodness judgment, beautiful faces during moral beauty judgment induced unique activity in the ventral medial prefrontal cortex and midline cortical structures involved in the emotional-valenced information about attractive faces. The opposite comparison elicited specific activity in the left superior temporal cortex and premotor area, which play a critical role in the recognition of facial identity. Our results demonstrated that the neural responses to facial attractiveness in the process of higher order moral decision-makings exhibit both task-general and task-specific characteristics. Our findings contribute to the understanding of the essence of the relationship between morality and aesthetics.

Highlights

  • The face is a highly salient social signal; people pay attention to faces

  • To investigate the neural responses to facial attractiveness, that occurred in the judgment tasks of moral goodness and moral beauty, our main analysis in general linear model (GLM) included 4 critical morally positive events (i.e., beautiful-face-version stimuli in moral goodness judgment (BFMG), ugly-face-version stimuli in moral goodness judgment (UFMG), beautiful-face-version stimuli in moral beauty judgment (BFMB) and ugly-face-version stimuli in moral beauty judgment (UFMB)) which parametrically modeled the moral ratings of the presented items, respectively

  • Compared to UFs, the condition of BFs in moral goodness judgment task significantly activated the left ventral occipitotemporal cortex (OTC), left superior temporal cortex (STC), left anterior temporal lobe (ATL) and left precentral gyrus/inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), the opposite contrast showed no significant region; whereas compared to UFs, the condition of BFs in moral beauty judgment task significantly activated the left ventral occipitotemporal visual cortex, left PCC/precuneus and ventral medial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), the opposite contrast showed that the condition of UFs significantly activated the medial PFC (i.e., ACC), left middle frontal gyrus (MFG) and left temporo-parietal junction (TPJ)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The face is a highly salient social signal; people pay attention to faces. Facial features that indicate an individual's biological and evolutionary fitness (Darwin, 1871) are commonly considered attractive (Perrett et al, 1999; Rhodes et al, 2001). Facial attractiveness and the positively-valenced stereotypical information with which it is typically associated is believed to come to mind spontaneously upon encountering attractive individuals (Olson & Marshuetz, 2005; van Leeuwen & Macrae, 2004). The IOG provide a coarse processing of some aspects of the visual stimulus, regions more anterior and including visual association cortices (e.g., FFA) construct more extensive, fine-grained perceptual representations that depend more on processing the configuration of the faces (Liu et al, 2010; Pitcher et al, 2011; Steeves et al, 2006). The FFA is thought to be the cortical source of the N170 response sensitive to facial attractiveness (Pizzagalli et al, 2002)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call