Abstract

Sensitivity to sound-level statistics is crucial for optimal perception, but research has focused mostly on neurophysiological recordings, whereas behavioral evidence is sparse. We use electroencephalography (EEG) and behavioral methods to investigate how sound-level statistics affect neural activity and the detection of near-threshold changes in sound amplitude. We presented noise bursts with sound levels drawn from distributions with either a low or a high modal sound level. One participant group listened to the stimulation while EEG was recorded (Experiment I). A second group performed a behavioral amplitude-modulation detection task (Experiment II). Neural activity depended on sound-level statistical context in two different ways. Consistent with an account positing that the sensitivity of neurons to sound intensity adapts to ambient sound level, responses for higher-intensity bursts were larger in low-mode than high-mode contexts, whereas responses for lower-intensity bursts did not differ between contexts. In contrast, a concurrent slow neural response indicated prediction-error processing: The response was larger for bursts at intensities that deviated from the predicted statistical context compared to those not deviating. Behavioral responses were consistent with prediction-error processing, but not with neural adaptation. Hence, neural activity adapts to sound-level statistics, but fine-tuning of perceptual sensitivity appears to involve neural prediction-error responses.

Highlights

  • The current study investigated the effects of sound-level statistical context on neural activity and perceptual sensitivity for sound level

  • Neural responses were affected by the statistical sound-level context in two different ways concurrently, providing evidence for both dynamic-range adaptation and prediction-error accounts (Experiment I)

  • Perceptual sensitivity to amplitude modulation was affected by the statistical sound-level context in a way consistent with prediction-error processing, but not with neural adaptation (Experiment II)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

According to this dynamic-range adaptation hypothesis, if adaptation shifts the neural response range based on sound-level statistical context, we should observe a large effect of context on a higher-level target sound, and much less effect of context on a lower-level sound (Fig. 1B, right). Under this scenario, we should observe a large effect of context for low-level and high-level target sounds, albeit of opposite direction (Fig. 1C, right). It is not clear whether neural adaptation to sound-level statistics is effective over these longer intervals

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call