Abstract

ObjectivesSelectively attending to a target talker while ignoring multiple interferers (competing talkers and background noise) is more difficult for hearing-impaired (HI) individuals compared to normal-hearing (NH) listeners. Such tasks also become more difficult as background noise levels increase. To overcome these difficulties, hearing aids (HAs) offer noise reduction (NR) schemes. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of NR processing (inactive, where the NR feature was switched off, vs. active, where the NR feature was switched on) on the neural representation of speech envelopes across two different background noise levels [+3 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and +8 dB SNR] by using a stimulus reconstruction (SR) method.DesignTo explore how NR processing supports the listeners’ selective auditory attention, we recruited 22 HI participants fitted with HAs. To investigate the interplay between NR schemes, background noise, and neural representation of the speech envelopes, we used electroencephalography (EEG). The participants were instructed to listen to a target talker in front while ignoring a competing talker in front in the presence of multi-talker background babble noise.ResultsThe results show that the neural representation of the attended speech envelope was enhanced by the active NR scheme for both background noise levels. The neural representation of the attended speech envelope at lower (+3 dB) SNR was shifted, approximately by 5 dB, toward the higher (+8 dB) SNR when the NR scheme was turned on. The neural representation of the ignored speech envelope was modulated by the NR scheme and was mostly enhanced in the conditions with more background noise. The neural representation of the background noise was modulated (i.e., reduced) by the NR scheme and was significantly reduced in the conditions with more background noise. The neural representation of the net sum of the ignored acoustic scene (ignored talker and background babble) was not modulated by the NR scheme but was significantly reduced in the conditions with a reduced level of background noise. Taken together, we showed that the active NR scheme enhanced the neural representation of both the attended and the ignored speakers and reduced the neural representation of background noise, while the net sum of the ignored acoustic scene was not enhanced.ConclusionAltogether our results support the hypothesis that the NR schemes in HAs serve to enhance the neural representation of speech and reduce the neural representation of background noise during a selective attention task. We contend that these results provide a neural index that could be useful for assessing the effects of HAs on auditory and cognitive processing in HI populations.

Highlights

  • Noise As hypothesized (H3), the active noise reduction (NR) processing reduced the overall neural representation of the background noise as compared to inactive NR

  • We examined the effect of NR processing on the neural representation of the attended talker, ignored talker, ignored background noise, and ignored acoustic scene across different signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)

  • These results validated that a NR scheme can significantly improve the neural representation of attended speech in, for the HI individuals, challenging sound environments and that this improvement could correspond to the shift of 5 dB toward the higher SNR

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Noise As hypothesized (H3), the active NR processing reduced the overall neural representation of the background noise as compared to inactive NR. This result was observed by reconstructing the envelope of unsegregated background noise sounds rather than reconstructing the envelope for each background noise object and averaging them. The activation of a NR scheme suppressed the background noise features in the evoked neural responses in HI listeners This finding confirms that NR processing plays a role in reducing background noise in the cortex and may lead the HA user to find the background noise less troubling (Dillon, 2012). This reduction is likely due to the NR algorithms applied in this study, which attenuates background noise by combining beam-former (Kjems and Jensen, 2012) and a single-channel Wiener post-filter (Jensen and Pedersen, 2015)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call