Abstract

There is an ongoing debate concerning the extent to which deficits in reading and spelling share cognitive components and whether they rely, in a similar fashion, on sublexical and lexical pathways of word processing. The present study investigates whether the neural substrates of word processing differ in children with various patterns of reading and spelling deficits. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we compared written and auditory processing in three groups of 9–13-year olds (N = 104): (1) with age-adequate reading and spelling skills; (2) with reading and spelling deficits (i.e., dyslexia); (3) with isolated spelling deficits but without reading deficits. In visual word processing, both deficit groups showed hypoactivations in the posterior superior temporal cortex compared to typical readers and spellers. Only children with dyslexia exhibited hypoactivations in the ventral occipito-temporal cortex compared to the two groups of typical readers. This is the result of an atypical pattern of higher activity in the occipito-temporal cortex for non-linguistic visual stimuli than for words, indicating lower selectivity. The print–speech convergence was reduced in the two deficit groups. Impairments in lexico-orthographic regions in a reading-based task were associated primarily with reading deficits, whereas alterations in the sublexical word processing route could be considered common for both reading and spelling deficits. These findings highlight the partly distinct alterations of the language network related to reading and spelling deficits.

Highlights

  • A central question in written language research is the extent to which the cognitive and neural systems underlying reading and spelling are independent or overlapping (Tainturier and Rapp 2001; Jones and Rawson 2016)

  • Post hoc comparisons revealed that the groups with dyslexia and isolated spelling deficit (ISD) underactivated the left STG/MTG cluster compared to controls

  • Only children with dyslexia exhibited hypoactivations in the ventral occipito-temporal cortex compared to the two groups of typical readers

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A central question in written language research is the extent to which the cognitive and neural systems underlying reading and spelling are independent or overlapping (Tainturier and Rapp 2001; Jones and Rawson 2016). According to the shared-components view, reading and spelling rely on the same phonological and orthographic components. The dissociation between reading and spelling deficits suggests underlying differences. According to the distinctcomponents view, the sublexical and lexical paths of word processing differ for spelling and reading processes. Frith (1980, 1985) proposed that spelling deficits are associated with degraded orthographic representations that are sufficient for reading but not for more demanding operations like orthographic decisions and spelling. Since spelling requires more knowledge of grapheme-to-phoneme associations, it is easier for most people to read a word than to spell it accurately (Holmes and Carruthers 1998)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call