Abstract

Commonly, a switch between networks mediating memory encoding and those mediating retrieval is observed. This may not only be due to differential involvement of neural resources due to distinct cognitive processes but could also reflect the formation of new memory traces and their dynamic change during consolidation. We used resting state fMRI to measure functional connectivity (FC) changes during post-encoding rest, hypothesizing that during this phase, new functional connections between encoding- and retrieval-related regions are created. Interfering and reminding tasks served as experimental modulators to corroborate that the observed FC differences indeed reflect changes specific to post-encoding rest. The right inferior occipital and fusiform gyri (active during encoding) showed increased FC with the left inferior frontal gyrus and the left middle temporal gyrus (MTG) during post-encoding rest. Importantly, the left MTG subsequently also mediated successful retrieval. This finding might reflect the formation of functional connections between encoding- and retrieval-related regions during undisturbed post-encoding rest. These connections were vulnerable to experimental modulation: Cognitive interference disrupted FC changes during post-encoding rest resulting in poorer memory performance. The presentation of reminders also inhibited FC increases but without affecting memory performance. Our results contribute to a better understanding of the mechanisms by which post-encoding rest bridges the gap between encoding- and retrieval-related networks.

Highlights

  • After encoding, newly learned information is consolidated and stored into long-term memory (Lechner et al, 1999; Dudai, 2004)

  • Since we were primarily interested in post-encoding functional connectivity (FC) after cognitive modulation or control, we focused our analysis on the resting state run preceding retrieval (R3) and compared it to baseline (R1)

  • Memory Performance Within each experimental condition, the number of correct responses significantly differed from chance, as demonstrated by one sample t-tests (test score: 16; mean number of correct responses [standard error (SE)]: interference task (IN): 38.67 (3.01), t(17) = 7,528, p < 0.01, RE: 45.72 (2.20), t(17) = 13.517, p < 0.01, C: 45.00 (2.33), t(17) = 12.421, p < 0.01

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Newly learned information is consolidated and stored into long-term memory (Lechner et al, 1999; Dudai, 2004). Beside the hippocampal formation, recent functional imaging data suggest that neocortical regions, which mediate memory encoding, remain active during post-encoding off-line consolidation (Foster and Wilson, 2006; Peigneux et al, 2006; Tambini et al, 2010; Kukolja et al, 2016). This activity may at least in part be due to repetitive (re-)activation of memory-specific neocortical networks, which seems to be one crucial process involved in early memory consolidation (Hoffman and McNaughton, 2002; Deuker et al, 2013; Atherton et al, 2015)

Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.