Neural Evidence of Cognitive Conflict During Binocular Rivalry

Abstract

To make sense of ambiguous and, at times, incomplete sensory input, the brain relies on a process of active interpretation. At any given moment, only one of several possible perceptual outcomes prevails in our conscious experience. Our hypothesis is that the competition between alternative representations induces cognitive conflict, eventually leading to fluctuations between different perceptual interpretations. We used binocular rivalry, a popular protocol to probe changes in perceptual awareness and drew on the conflict monitoring theory, which holds that cognitive control is invoked by the detection of conflict during information processing. We looked for an increase in power of fronto-medial theta oscillations (5-7 Hz), an established EEG marker of conflict detection. Our results show that fm-theta power increases right before perceptual alternations and decreases thereafter, suggesting that conflict monitoring is related to perceptual competition. Furthermore, to investigate conflict resolution via attentional engagement, as held by the conflict monitoring theory, we also looked for changes in parieto-occipital alpha oscillations (8-12 Hz) associated to perceptual switches. These oscillations have been associated to attention allocation via functional inhibition in sensory cortices. The power of parieto-occipital alpha was inversely related to that of fm-theta, reflecting periods of high inter-ocular inhibition during stable perception, and low inhibition around moments of perceptual change. Our findings validate a prediction made 20 years ago in the seminal paper formulating the conflict monitoring theory, and establish a previously unknown link between conflict mechanisms and the processes leading to perceptual awareness.