Abstract

Morphemes are the smallest meaning-carrying units in human language, and are among the most basic building blocks through which humans express specific ideas and concepts. By using time-resolved cortical stimulations, neural recordings, and focal lesion evaluations, we show that inhibition of a small cortical area within the left dominant posterior–superior temporal lobe selectively impairs the ability to produce appropriate functional morphemes but does not distinctly affect semantic and lexical retrieval, comprehension, or articulation. Additionally, neural recordings within this area reveal the localized encoding of morphological properties and their planned production prior to speech onset. Finally, small lesions localized to the gray matter in this area result in a selective functional morpheme-production deficit. Collectively, these findings reveal a detailed division of linguistic labor within the posterior–superior temporal lobe and suggest that functional morpheme processing constitutes an operationally discrete step in the series of computations essential to language production.

Highlights

  • Morphemes are the smallest meaning-carrying units in human language, and are among the most basic building blocks through which humans express specific ideas and concepts

  • A number of sophisticated cognitive models of language production that specify the different stages and the relationships among them have been proposed[1,2,3,4,5,21], understanding the precise neural mechanisms by which humans encode and time-causally enact different aspects of a linguistic message––including the division of labor spatially and temporally––has proven to be a major challenge

  • To the extent that the same brain region supports different stages of language production, a permanent lesion to a region would not allow for temporal differentiation of those stages

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Morphemes are the smallest meaning-carrying units in human language, and are among the most basic building blocks through which humans express specific ideas and concepts. Fourteen participants underwent stimulation in a total of 54 registered sites (Fig. 1c; “Methods”), and deficits for each site were defined based on whether the correct target word was produced in the control, syntactic, phonetic, lexical, and/or semantic conditions.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call