Abstract

Event Abstract Back to Event Neural correlates of individual differences in retrieval cue processing Emma K. Bridger1*, J. E. Herron1 and E. L. Wilding1 1 School of Psychology, Cardiff University, United Kingdom It is generally assumed that strategic processes that are engaged at the time of retrieval benefit the accuracy of memory judgments. There is, however, little direct evidence to support this assumption. In event-related potential (ERP) studies, indices of strategic retrieval processing have been obtained by contrasting the activity that is elicited by items with no study history (new items) across tasks with different retrieval demands. It has been argued that since these classes of items have not been encountered in prior study phases, any differences between the neural activities that they elicit are likely to reflect task-specific operations that are engaged in service of retrieval. In no studies to date, however, has it been possible to claim that these markers of retrieval processing influence the accuracy of memory judgments. The experiment reported here was designed in order to determine whether this is in fact the case. Toward this end, participants completed two memory tasks, thereby permitting comparisons between new item ERPs across situations in which retrieval demands differed. The degree to which task-specific retrieval processing was engaged was operationalised as the magnitude of the differences between the new item ERPs elicited in the two tasks. There was a positive correlation between response accuracy and the magnitude of this ERP measure of task-specific retrieval processing. The data provides the first compelling demonstration that strategic retrieval processing benefits memory accuracy. Conference: 10th International Conference on Cognitive Neuroscience, Bodrum, Turkey, 1 Sep - 5 Sep, 2008. Presentation Type: Poster Presentation Topic: Memory & Learning Citation: Bridger EK, Herron JE and Wilding EL (2008). Neural correlates of individual differences in retrieval cue processing. Conference Abstract: 10th International Conference on Cognitive Neuroscience. doi: 10.3389/conf.neuro.09.2009.01.264 Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters. The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated. Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed. For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions. Received: 09 Dec 2008; Published Online: 09 Dec 2008. * Correspondence: Emma K Bridger, School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom, BridgerEK@cf.ac.uk Login Required This action requires you to be registered with Frontiers and logged in. To register or login click here. Abstract Info Abstract The Authors in Frontiers Emma K Bridger J. E Herron E. L Wilding Google Emma K Bridger J. E Herron E. L Wilding Google Scholar Emma K Bridger J. E Herron E. L Wilding PubMed Emma K Bridger J. E Herron E. L Wilding Related Article in Frontiers Google Scholar PubMed Abstract Close Back to top Javascript is disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser settings in order to see all the content on this page.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call