Abstract
ABSTRACT Formal semantics states that the meanings of phrases are composed from the meanings of constituent parts and syntax. Little is known about how composition is neurally implemented. We studied ERP and behavioural responses to determiner-adjective-noun phrases. We assessed the effects of typicality and denotation, using intersective (typical: “A green turtle”, atypical: “An orange turtle”) or subsective adjectives (typical: “A slow turtle”, atypical: “A fast turtle”). After each phrase, participants responded to two questions (e.g., for “A fast turtle”: “Is it a common turtle?”; “Is it a fast animal?”). We contrasted these 4 semantic conditions, requiring composition, to 2 nonsemantic conditions, where the adjective was replaced with a pseudoword or a nonword. This contrast revealed a larger P600, if participants performed the task without instructions and feedback (experiment 1), or a larger sustained negativity, if they were nudged to pay attention to meaning by instructions and feedback (experiment 2). Typicality or denotation had an impact only on behavioural responses. We discuss implications for theories of language processing and compositional semantics.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
