Abstract

Both targeted and untargeted mass spectrometry-based metabolomics approaches are used to understand the metabolic processes taking place in various organisms, from prokaryotes, plants, fungi to animals and humans. Untargeted approaches allow to detect as many metabolites as possible at once, identify unexpected metabolic changes, and characterize novel metabolites in biological samples. However, the identification of metabolites and the biological interpretation of such large and complex datasets remain challenging. One approach to address these challenges is considering that metabolites are connected through informative relationships. Such relationships can be formalized as networks, where the nodes correspond to the metabolites or features (when there is no or only partial identification), and edges connect nodes if the corresponding metabolites are related. Several networks can be built from a single dataset (or a list of metabolites), where each network represents different relationships, such as statistical (correlated metabolites), biochemical (known or putative substrates and products of reactions), or chemical (structural similarities, ontological relations). Once these networks are built, they can subsequently be mined using algorithms from network (or graph) theory to gain insights into metabolism. For instance, we can connect metabolites based on prior knowledge on enzymatic reactions, then provide suggestions for potential metabolite identifications, or detect clusters of co-regulated metabolites. In this review, we first aim at settling a nomenclature and formalism to avoid confusion when referring to different networks used in the field of metabolomics. Then, we present the state of the art of network-based methods for mass spectrometry-based metabolomics data analysis, as well as future developments expected in this area. We cover the use of networks applications using biochemical reactions, mass spectrometry features, chemical structural similarities, and correlations between metabolites. We also describe the application of knowledge networks such as metabolic reaction networks. Finally, we discuss the possibility of combining different networks to analyze and interpret them simultaneously.

Highlights

  • Metabolomics research is based on various opportunities to uncover the metabolites contained in biological samples

  • Two major approaches are used in metabolomics: targeted methods look for a pre-selected list of metabolites, and untargeted metabolomics covers as many metabolites as possible (Schrimpe-Rutledge et al, 2016)

  • Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) techniques are used in metabolomics (Emwas et al, 2019), but most of the network and graph methods covered here are rather focused on MS-based metabolomics

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Metabolomics research is based on various opportunities to uncover the metabolites contained in biological samples. Untargeted MS data, either based on direct infusion or coupled to different types of separation techniques (e.g., LC, GC, CE, or IM), is characterized by features for which we measured the massto-charge ratio (m/z value with a mass accuracy of just a few ppm, depending on the instrumentation), the abundance (either a peak intensity or a peak area), an additional separation index (retention or migration time, mobility, or collisional crosssection value), and the associated fragmentation pattern, if collected Based on these data, metabolites can be annotated or identified with different confidence levels, according to the Metabolomics Standard Initiative (MSI) (Fiehn et al, 2007; Sumner et al, 2007; Schymanski et al, 2014). These changes can be measured in MS-based metabolomics as differences between pairs of m/z values (Figure 2A) to generate a mass difference network (Table 1)

Limitations
Findings
CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call