Abstract

This paper investigates the possibility of saving a network that is predicted to have a cascading failure that will eventually lead to a total collapse. We model cascading failures using the recently proposed KQ model. Then predict an impending total collapse by monitoring critical slowing down indicators and subsequently attempt to prevent the total collapse of the network by adding new nodes. To this end, we systematically evaluate five node addition rules, the effect of intervention delay and network degree heterogeneity. Surprisingly, unlike for random homogeneous networks, we find that a delayed intervention is preferred for saving scale free networks. We also find that for homogeneous networks, the best strategy is to wire newly added nodes to existing nodes in a uniformly random manner. For heterogeneous networks, however, a random selection of nodes based on their degree mostly outperforms a uniform random selection. These results provide new insights into restoring networks by adding nodes after observing early warnings of an impending complete breakdown.

Highlights

  • Cascading failures and the recovery from them is one of the most popular research directions in network science

  • We focus on cases with sudden total collapse after a pseudo-steady state

  • We focus on two cases: ER networks with 〈k〉 = 20, ks = 11, q = 0.09 and f = 0.1, and SF networks with γ = 1.8, ks = 5, q = 0.39 and f = 0.2

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cascading failures and the recovery from them is one of the most popular research directions in network science. Et al presented a universal model for hybrid percolation transitions and investigated the resulting critical cascading process[36] Most of these studies mainly focused on interpreting the time length of the critical slowing down phase. Early warning indicators for system transitions based on the critical slowing down have already been evaluated for many real systems[37,38,39,40,41,42] This technique has been used for predicting system collapse in cascading failure models. For SF networks, a roulette selection based on each node’s original degree (or its reciprocal) can perform better for earlier node additions These results provide insights on how to save a system that has been predicted to collapse

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call