Abstract

In order to work on and implement new ideas, idea creators usually need funding. Provided that there are limited resources, however, not every idea can and will be selected for funding. In this study, we explore in what ways the network cohesion of an idea creator may influence idea funding decisions, and how these funding decisions differ between female and male idea creators. For this purpose, we analyze data on research proposals which were submitted to a national science foundation by early-career scholars in 2014 and 2015. We argue that the effects of network cohesion on the idea creator’s competence (as perceived by idea assessors) are positive for male idea creators, but negative for female idea creators. In addition, we suggest that the effect of perceived competence on idea funding is stronger for male idea creators compared to female idea creators. Controlling for the assessed quality of the research idea, we find confirmation for our moderation hypotheses. Our findings demonstrate the complex ways in which gender bias continues to influence idea funding decisions, ultimately disadvantaging the development of ideas proposed by women.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.