Abstract

Scholars have long noted how migration streams, once initiated, obtain a self-feeding character. Studies have connected this phenomenon, called the cumulative causation of migration, to expanding social networks that link migrants in destination to individuals in origin. While extant research has established a positive association between individuals’ ties to prior migrants and their migration propensities, seldom have researchers interrogated how multiple social mechanisms—as well as exposure to common environmental factors—might account for these interdependencies. This article uses a mixed-methods strategy to identify the social mechanisms underlying the network effects in Mexico–U.S. migration. Three types of social mechanisms are identified, which all lead to network effects: (a) social facilitation, which is at work when network peers such as family or community members provide useful information or help that reduces the costs or increases the benefits of migration; (b) normative influence, which operates when network peers offer social rewards or impose sanctions to encourage or discourage migration; and (c) network externalities, which are at work when prior migrants generate a pool of common resources that increase the value or reduce the costs of migration for potential migrants. The authors first use large-sample survey data from the Mexican Migration Project to establish the presence of network effects and then rely on 138 in-depth interviews with migrants and their family members in Mexico to identify the social mechanisms underlying these network effects. The authors thus provide a deeper understanding of migration as a social process, which they argue is crucial for anticipating and responding to future flows.

Highlights

  • Half of the 11.7 million Mexico-born persons in the United States today are estimated to be undocumented (Passel et al 2012).1 This population’s dramatic growth and remarkable persistence since the mid-1960s is surprising given several changes to U.S immigration policy that have attempted to stem its flow over the last five decades

  • In the context of Mexico-U.S migration, the inability to link theory to multiple types of evidence leaves us with two interrelated questions that we address in this chapter: what economic, political, or social factors lead a person to migrate to the United States from Mexico and, if social factors influence the migration decision, in what ways do connections to prior migrants make future migration more likely?

  • We prefer DiMaggio and Garip’s (2012) typology because we focus on different types of network effects rather than on the different types of channels through which these effects reach the individual

Read more

Summary

Published Version Citable link Terms of Use

Harvard University [Article forthcoming in the American Behavioral Scientist, special issue edited by Christofer Edling and Jens Rydgren]

INTRODUCTION
Network Externalities and Migration
CONCLUSION
Findings
Community in metropolitan area
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call