Abstract

The paper is based on Grubbström’s MRP theory previously used in analysis of production processes “under one roof ”. This theory has recently been extended to model global supply chains by Bogataj and Grubbström, both scientists from the MEDIFAS faculty. Every production cycle is followed by distribution, consumption and recycling activities. In broad supply chains, transportation costs between pairs of activity cells have a significant impact on the overall net present value of the system. Possible flows inside or between subsystems can all be described with input-output matrices H and G. Recently published papers of the above mentioned authors describe the presentation of supply chains in a generalized form. Generalized input and output matrices H( )s ( and ( )s ( G hold technical coefficients and lead times. Lead times are split into 2 parts: production and transportation. As presented in the publication of R. W. Grubbström, L. Bogataj and M. Bogataj, and further research of these authors, the results of recycling activities in the extended MRP model are the recovered and the waste items, but in their model the recycling of the items is not repeated. Recovered items could be reused several times in future production cycles, reducing the need to purchase new items on the market as considered here. The waste items must be disposed of, requiring environmental taxes which vary among regions, depending on local environmental policy. If recovered, items must be delivered from the recycling facility back to production, and waste items must be sent to landfills. This process requires an expenditure of human resources, and energy at each activity cell plays an important role. In this article we show how the location of recycling facilities, the prices and quantity of energy needed and the environmental taxes can drastically influence the net present value for the entire system. We also present the method for evaluating cases where energy can be recovered during recycling or decomposition processes at landfills. It is also assumed that energy recovery can be stimulated with subsidized purchase prices, but generally, lower quality energy can be expected as an output of these processes. This paper introduces generalized input and output energy matrices, which describe these energy flows and their impact on environmental sustainability through the net present value of the system, which is the novelty in the extended MRP theory.

Highlights

  • Material Requirements Planning (MRP) theory has been widely researched and improved upon over the last quarter of a century

  • While in majority of papers cost approach is used (Zeballos et al 2014; Rappold, Yoho 2014), Net Present Value (NPV) approach developed by Grubbström enable a broader study of equilibrium for Economy – Energy – Environment

  • This study proves that extended MRP theory is a useful tool for observing the wider aspects of environmental issues at the macroeconomic level and their impact on decisions made on micro level

Read more

Summary

Introduction

MRP theory has been widely researched and improved upon over the last quarter of a century. This extension has been further elaborated in papers of Bogataj, Grubbström (2012, 2013) and the influence of aging on timing in such systems has been evaluated in Bogataj et al (2013) while implementation in food industry is presented in Kovačić et al (2015). Kovačić, Bogataj (2013) were the first to present energy as an input into the system This inclusion merely focuses on the impact of energy on the behavior of the return rates of used elements, which are covered under technology coefficients of generalized output matrix G (ρ). Modern technology allows us to “recycle” energy: it can appear as a by-product of reverse logistics or as a result of decomposition of waste material in the landfill In this last case, additional decomposition lead times should be considered in the model. It will be shown that for this reason subsidizing the recovery is necessary for stimulating energy reuse because, from economic perspective, other sources of energy could be cheaper if environmental policy does not support the internalization of environmental damages

Energy in extended MRP theory
Numerical example
Findings
Discussion and conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call