Abstract

On average, firms’ going public severely underperform compared to the market, a phenomenon which is widely known in the literature as IPO underperformance. Though there is no generally accepted theory on the reasons, information asymmetries and the scarcity of information on the issuers is generally considered to contribute to the phenomenon. Accounting data provided by issuers in the offering prospectuses is mostly backward-looking information that is of limited use in forming expectations of future performance. This problem becomes even more pressing, given the increasing fraction of loss firms among IPOs. Net deferred tax assets (NDTA), however, are a balance sheet item that can be expected to include forward-looking information on future earnings. Reporting under IFRS, firms may recognize NDTA only to the extent, that positive income will be available in future periods. We, therefore, expect NDTA to be positively associated with the long-run performance of IPOs. Investigating a sample of firms going public in Germany between 2005 and 2015, we find that NDTA are positively associated with long-run stock price performance. The association is particularly strong among loss firms. Our findings are relevant especially to investors, who regularly have difficulties valuing loss firms. We show that firms which recognized NDTA perform much better in the aftermarket than those that do not have NDTA on the balance sheet. The most important lesson to be learned is that IPO firms that did not recognize NDTA will likely be very poor investments.

Highlights

  • Public firms show a number of anomalies after getting listed on the stock exchange for the first time

  • Mean and median values for ABHR and cumulative abnormal returns (CAR) based on all four benchmarks are negative and the mean and median values for the wealth relative (WR) are smaller than one, indicating that Initial Public Offerings (IPO) firms did severely underperform

  • The reason for this pattern may be that IPO firms themselves are included in CDAX and some may have been included in SDAX, which depresses the performance of these indices somewhat towards the performance of the IPO firms

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Public firms show a number of anomalies after getting listed on the stock exchange for the first time. Making this scarcity of information even more pressing is the widely held suspicion that the earnings reported in the prospectus may be artificially inflated by the firm’s management in order to obtain higher valuations and to justify higher offer prices (Aharony et al, 1993; Friedlan, 1994; Lee & Masulis, 2011) Investigating this issue, a number of studies found that many firms increase their earnings prior to their IPO by both accruals (Aharony et al, 1993; Friedlan, 1994; Teoh et al, 1998; Rosenboom et al, 2003; Morsfield & Tan, 2006; Gounopoulos & Pham, 2017) and real earnings management (Darrough & Rangan, 2005; Wongsunwei, 2013; Alhadab et al, 2016). Some studies report the contrary, namely that IPO firms report more conservatively than other firms (Ball & Shivakumar, 2008; Cecchini et al, 2012)

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call