Abstract

For problems requiring both model comparison and parameter estimation, nested sampling is an attractive choice because it provides an estimate of the normalized posterior. The critical assumption of nested sampling is that exploration proceeds regularly toward the region of maximum likelihood. However, in practice, achieving such regular compression is far from trivial, particularly for realistic, multi-modal problems. This paper offers a comparison of settings required for nested sampling with the purpose of maximizing consistency and robustness. In particular, the ensemble size, amount of exploration, and likelihood function are compared, and approximate settings recommended, for two example problems in acoustic data analysis.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.