Abstract

During colony growth, leaf-cutting ants enlarge their nests by excavating tunnels and chambers housing their fungus gardens and brood. Workers are expected to excavate new nest chambers at locations across the soil profile that offer suitable environmental conditions for brood and fungus rearing. It is an open question whether new chambers are excavated in advance, or will emerge around brood or fungus initially relocated to a suitable site in a previously-excavated tunnel. In the laboratory, we investigated the mechanisms underlying the excavation of new nest chambers in the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex lundi. Specifically, we asked whether workers relocate brood and fungus to suitable nest locations, and to what extent the relocated items trigger the excavation of a nest chamber and influence its shape. When brood and fungus were exposed to unfavorable environmental conditions, either low temperatures or low humidity, both were relocated, but ants clearly preferred to relocate the brood first. Workers relocated fungus to places containing brood, demonstrating that subsequent fungus relocation spatially follows the brood deposition. In addition, more ants aggregated at sites containing brood. When presented with a choice between two otherwise identical digging sites, but one containing brood, ants' excavation activity was higher at this site, and the shape of the excavated cavity was more rounded and chamber-like. The presence of fungus also led to the excavation of rounder shapes, with higher excavation activity at the site that also contained brood. We argue that during colony growth, workers preferentially relocate brood to suitable locations along a tunnel, and that relocated brood spatially guides fungus relocation and leads to increased digging activity around them. We suggest that nest chambers are not excavated in advance, but emerge through a self-organized process resulting from the aggregation of workers and their density-dependent digging behavior around the relocated brood and fungus.

Highlights

  • Leaf-cutting ants build the most complex underground nests among ants

  • Nest depths of 8 m have been reported for Atta laevigata [4,14]. These main tunnels connect to the nest chambers, which are oriented laterally to tunnels, mostly by one short and narrow branched off tunnel called peduncle, which end in the lower part of the chamber [4,14,15]

  • The main tunnels can have blind endings and a recent study using cement casts from Atta laevigata and Atta capiguara nests showed that these tunnels may have the beginnings of branched off peduncles, which end blind without excavated chambers [14]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Leaf-cutting ants build the most complex underground nests among ants. Their nests may consist of up to eight thousand underground chambers housing their symbiotic fungus, brood embedded within the fungus and in several species, the colony’s refuse [1,2,3]. When the first leaf-cutting ant workers appear 8–12 weeks after colony founding [27,28], they are responsible for further nest enlargement, achieved by the excavation of tunnels, mostly leading downwards, and the excavation of new fungus chambers at deeper soil layers [27,29]. Even when the conditions are not unsuitable, workers may find, or search for, more favorable conditions at a different location All these four scenarios would potentially lead to brood and fungal deposition at a new site in the nest, i.e. in an existing tunnel, and to the subsequent excavation around them to create a chamber. Chambers were excavated as soon as the ants were allowed to relocate symbiotic fungus inside a digging arena, and digging activity concentrated around the deposited fungus This suggests that beyond abiotic stimuli, contents to be stored are needed for the emergence of a nest chamber. Based on our findings we propose a densitydependent mechanism for the emergence of nest chambers through a self-organized process, with relocated brood and fungus acting as cues that elicit worker aggregation at their deposition sites, indirectly influencing the intensity of digging activity

Materials and Methods
Results
Findings
Discussion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.