Abstract

BackgroundThe Columbia classification is widely used for diagnosis of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). In practice, we occasionally encounter segmental glomerular lesions unclassified as Columbia classification. We analyzed the clinical implication of unclassified segmental lesions comparing with Columbia-classified FSGS.MethodsA retrospective cohort study from 13 local hospitals in Japan. From 172 biopsy cases diagnosed with FSGS or minimal change disease (MCD)/FSGS spectrum with unclassified segmental lesions, adult patients with nephrotic syndrome who received immunosuppressive therapies were included. The cases are classified by pathology, i.e., typical FSGS lesions sufficiently classified into subgroups of Columbia classification: collapsing (COL), tip (TIP), cellular (CEL), perihilar (PH), and not otherwise specified (NOS), and unclassified by the Columbia classification into three subgroups: “endothelial damage,”; “simple attachment,”; and “minor cellular lesion,”. The response to immunosuppressive treatment and 30% decline of eGFR were compared.ResultsAmong 48 eligible cases, all were Japanese, 34 were typical FSGS; 13 TIP, 15 CEL, 6 NOS, and no COL or PH cases. Fourteen were unclassified cases: endothelial damage (n = 6), simple attachment (n = 5), and minor cellular lesion (n = 3). The median age of overall patients was 60 years old and the median of eGFR and urinary protein creatinine ratio was 51.5 mL/min/1.73m2 and 7.35, respectively. They received similar therapeutic regimen. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no significant difference in treatment response between typical FSGS and unclassified cases. Evaluating among the subgroups, endothelial damage, simple attachment and minor cellular lesion showed similar treatment response to TIP or CEL. No significant difference was also observed in the 30% decline of eGFR.ConclusionsJapanese adult patients with nephrotic syndrome showing unclassified segmental lesions as Columbia classification may be equivalent clinical impact as Columbia classification of FSGS.

Highlights

  • Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a major cause of nephrotic syndrome (NS) leading to end stage renal disease [1]

  • From 172 biopsy cases diagnosed with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) or minimal change disease (MCD)/FSGS spectrum with unclassified segmental lesions, adult patients with nephrotic syndrome who received immunosuppressive therapies were included

  • The cases are classified by pathology, i.e., typical FSGS lesions sufficiently classified into subgroups of Columbia classification: collapsing (COL), tip (TIP), cellular (CEL), perihilar (PH), and not otherwise specified (NOS), and unclassified by the Columbia classification into three subgroups: “endothelial damage,”; “simple attachment,”; and “minor cellular lesion,”

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a major cause of nephrotic syndrome (NS) leading to end stage renal disease [1]. FSGS was classically indicated in pediatric patients with steroid-resistant NS who demonstrated segmental obliteration of the glomerular capillaries [2]. Since the 1980s, non-classical segmental lesions, including glomerular tip lesions, cellular lesions, and collapsing nephropathy, have been identified as FSGS [3,4,5]. To date, these pathological features are considered to represent the consequences of glomerular injury centered on podocytes and their repair processes [6,7]. The Columbia classification is widely used for diagnosis of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). We analyzed the clinical implication of unclassified segmental lesions comparing with Columbia-classified FSGS

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call