Abstract

To compare the effectiveness of nepafenac 0.10% in achieving and maintaining pupil dilation with the effectiveness of flurbiprofen 0.03% and a placebo in a rabbit model. Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA. Laboratory study. Adult pigmented rabbits were randomized to 3 equal-sized groups: placebo, flurbiprofen, and nepafenac. Cataract surgery was performed in randomized order by a surgeon who was masked to group assignment. The treatment or placebo was administered starting 1 day before surgery. Phenylephrine 10.0% was administered starting 30 minutes before surgery. Phacoemulsification was performed in standard fashion. Pupil measurements were recorded before and after surgery. A linear mixed model with a random effect for the rabbits and a fixed effect for the treatment groups was used to compare mean pupil diameters between groups. Baseline pupil measurements were similar between the placebo, flurbiprofen, and nepafenac groups. Preoperative pupil dilation was statistically significantly greater in the nepafenac group (mean 11.5 mm ± 0.5 [SD]) than in the placebo group (mean 10.2 ± 1.1 mm) and the flurbiprofen group (mean 9.9 ± 1.1 mm) (P<.005 and P<.001, respectively). The greater dilation was maintained at the end of surgery, at which time the nepafenac group had statistically significantly larger pupils (mean 9.4 ± 1.2 mm) than the placebo group (mean 7.9 ± 0.6 mm) and the flurbiprofen group (mean 8.5 ± 0.9 mm) (P<.001 and P<.05, respectively). Nepafenac was more effective than a placebo and flurbiprofen in achieving maximum preoperative and postoperative pupil mydriasis in rabbits.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.