Neonatal hemolytic disease: How should we use indirect and direct antiglobulin tests?

Abstract

In newborns with hemolysis, the direct antiglobulin test (DAT) and indirect antiglobulin test (IAT) play a key role in demonstrating the presence of an immune cause. We aimed to emphasize the importance of IAT in mothers of DAT-positive babies. DAT was performed with forward blood grouping on cord blood in term babies who were born between September 2020 and September 2022. IAT was performed in the mothers of the babies who were found to have a positive DAT and antibody identification was performed in the mothers who were found to have a positive IAT. Specific antibodies detected and identified were associated with the clinical course. The study included 2769 babies and their mothers. The prevalence of DAT positivity was found to be 3.3% (87 of 2661). In DAT-positive babies, the rate of ABO incompatibility was 45.9%, the rate of RhD incompatibility was 5.7% and the rate of RhD and ABO incompatibility in association was 10.3%. The rate of subgroup incompatibility and other red blood cell antibodies was 18.3%. Phototherapy was applied because of indirect hyperbilirubinemia in 16.6% of the DAT-negative babies and in 51.5% of the DAT-positive babies. The need for phototherapy was significantly higher in DAT-positive infants (p<0.01). Severe hemolytic disease of the newborn, bilirubin level, duration of phototherapy and use of intravenous immunoglobulin were found to be significantly higher in the babies whose mothers were IAT positive compared with the babies whose mothers were IAT negative (p<0.01). IAT should be performed on all pregnant women. When screening with IAT is not performed during pregnancy, performing DAT in the baby plays a key role. We showed that the clinical course was more severe when mothers of DAT-positive babies were IAT positive.