Abstract

BackgroundThe current practice for new-born eye examination by an Ophthalmologist in Malaysian hospitals is limited to only preterm new-borns, syndromic or ill infants. Healthy term new-borns are usually discharged without a thorough eye examination. This study is aimed at determining the proportion and types of ocular abnormalities detected in purportedly healthy term new-borns.MethodThis cross-sectional study is comprised of 203 participants, all purportedly healthy term new-born infants from the Obstetrics and Gynaecology ward at Hospital Kuala Lumpur over a 6 months period. The examination list includes external eye examination, red reflex test, and fundus imaging using a wide-field digital retinal imaging system (Phoenix Clinical ICON Paediatric Retinal Camera) by a trained Investigator. The pathologies detected were documented. The results were compared and correlated with similar studies published in the literature previously.ResultsTotal ocular abnormalities were detected in 34% of the infants. The most common finding was retinal haemorrhage in 29.6% of the infants, of which 53.3% occurred bilaterally. Spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD) remained the greatest risk factor which has nearly 3.5 times higher risk of new-borns developing retinal haemorrhage compared to Lower Segment Caesarean Section (LSCS). There was a 6% increased likelihood of developing retinal haemorrhage for every 1-min increment in the duration of 2nd stage of labour.ConclusionUniversal eye screening for all new-borns using a wide-field digital imaging system is realistically possible, safe, and useful in detecting posterior segment disorders. The most common abnormality detected is retinal haemorrhage.

Highlights

  • The current practice for new-born eye examination by an Ophthalmologist in Malaysian hospitals is limited to only preterm new-borns, syndromic or ill infants

  • Spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD) remained the greatest risk factor which has nearly 3.5 times higher risk of new-borns developing retinal haemorrhage compared to Lower Segment Caesarean Section (LSCS)

  • Our findings showed that there was a larger proportion of new-borns delivered by SVD in the abnormal ocular group (p < 0.001) compared to new-borns with normal ocular findings

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The current practice for new-born eye examination by an Ophthalmologist in Malaysian hospitals is limited to only preterm new-borns, syndromic or ill infants. This study is aimed at determining the proportion and types of ocular abnormalities detected in purportedly healthy term new-borns. The current practice for new-born eye examination by an Ophthalmologist in Malaysian hospitals includes only those deemed at risk. Normal healthy term new-borns will undergo a general examination by the Paediatrician using direct ophthalmoscope by looking at the red reflex and referred to an Ophthalmologist only if those basic screening tests are grossly abnormal. The red reflex test is a useful universal screening tool in the detection of anterior abnormalities. The test has limitations in detection of posterior abnormalities This stresses the point that the current eye assessment protocol is insufficient and may have underdiagnosed certain posterior segment eye diseases. The main reason why neonatal eye screening is not compulsory for normal term new-borns can be attributed to lack of human resources, time and financial cost

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call