Neoadjuvant Versus Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Non-Metastatic Locally-Advanced Stage Radical Cystectomy Candidates

Abstract

IntroductionAdministration of chemotherapy before radical cystectomy (RC) in neoadjuvant setting (NAC) or after RC in adjuvant setting (ADJ) are both associated with a survival benefit relative to RC alone. However, no study directly compared the magnitude of such benefit associated with NAC versus ADJ in locally-advanced UCUB patients (T3-T4N0M0). We addressed this knowledge gap. MethodsWithin the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2007–2020), we identified T3-T4N0M0 UCUB patients who underwent NAC+RC or RC+ADJ. Cumulative incidence plots and multivariable competing risks regression (CRR) models were fitted. The same methodology was then re-applied in T3 and then T4 patient subgroups. ResultsOf 875 assessable patients, 603 harbored T3 stage (69.0%) and 272 harbored T4 stage (31.0%). Of all 875, 563 (64.0%) underwent RC+ADJ versus 312 (36.0%) NAC+RC. NAC+RC rates increased over time (EAPC=+6.1%, P = .001). Cumulative incidence plots derived five-year CSM rates were 40.3% in NAC+RC versus 36.1% in RC+ADJ patients (P = .2). In multivariable CRR models that also adjusted for OCM, no statistically significant difference in CSM was recorded when NAC+RC was compared to RC+ADJ (HR:0.85, P = .1). Virtually the same observations were made in subgroup analyses where CSM associated with NAC+RC was not different from that recorded in RC+ADJ (HR: 0.89 and P = .4 in T3 stage and HR:0.8 and P = .2 in T4 stage). ConclusionIn locally-advanced UCUB, NAC rates have sharply increased over time. However, the approach based on neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to RC have not resulted in a statistically significant CSM benefit relative to RC+ADJ.