Abstract

ObjectivesThe aim of the study is to evaluate the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACHT) of patients with recurrent cervical cancer who were poor candidates for pelvic exenteration (PE), and the impact on DFS and OS. MethodsA retrospective data collection extracted from medical records of 61 patients submitted to pelvic exenteration was performed: 30 underwent up-front exenterative procedure whereas 31 received NACHT. ResultsThe median tumor size was significantly (P=0.0006) larger in the NACHT group compared to the up-front PE one (43.9mm vs 28mm), and a significant (P=0.04) higher percentage of patients (45 vs 20%) had lateral pelvic wall invasion in the NACHT group. No statistically significant difference in early and late complications was observed in the two groups. Median overall survival in study population was 42.9months (95% CI: 22.2, 180.8). Median overall survival times as well as recurrence free survival times were not significantly different between NACHT (42.9months and 36.1months for OS and DFS respectively) vs. No NACHT (111.9months and 48.1months for OS and DFS respectively). There was an overall significant difference in DFS between negative and positive margins but the curves were similar for NACHT and up-front PE groups stratified by resection margin status. ConclusionsIn our series, though small and retrospective, NACHT prior to PE represents a feasible therapeutic option without intra-operative and early post-operative mortality or worsening of early and late complication rate and with acceptable long-term survival and DFS for recurrent cervical cancer patients who are poor candidates for up-front pelvic exenteration.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.