Abstract

The effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) compared with CCRT alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients who presented with cervical nodal necrosis (CNN) is unknown. A total of 792 patients with stage T1-4N1-3M0 NPC and presented with CNN based on magnetic resonance imaging were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity score matching method was used to balance treatment arms for baseline characteristics. Eventually, 508 patients were propensity-matched on a 1:1 basis to create two groups (NACT + CCRT and CCRT groups). Survival rates were calculated by Kaplan–Meier method and differences were compared by using the log-rank test. The 5-year disease specific survival, disease-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival were significantly higher in NACT + CCRT group relative to the matched CCRT group (82.1% vs. 72.5%, P = 0.021; 70.3% vs. 54.1%, P < 0.001; 81.9% vs. 67.3%, P < 0.001, respectively). Although the rates of grade 3–4 leucopenia and mucositis were higher in NACT + CCRT group than CCRT group, compliance with the combined treatment was good and no significant difference was observed between two groups. NACT followed by CCRT was relatively safe and could achieve better survival than CCRT alone in NPC patients with CNN by reducing the risk of death, tumor progression and distant metastasis.

Highlights

  • Treatment failure pattern Distant metastases alone Bone Lung Liver Bone +Lung Bone +Liver Lung +Liver Bone +Lung +Liver Brain Other* Total Distant metastasis +recurrence Local-regional recurrence alone Local Regional Local +regional Total

  • To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to explore the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients diagnosed with CNN

  • We demonstrated that NACT followed by CCRT could improve Disease-specific survival (DSS), disease free survival (DFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) in this particular group of patients, when compared with CCRT alone

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Treatment failure pattern Distant metastases alone Bone Lung Liver Bone +Lung Bone +Liver Lung +Liver Bone +Lung +Liver Brain Other* Total Distant metastasis +recurrence Local-regional recurrence alone Local Regional Local +regional Total. CNN has previously been reported as a strong, independent negative prognostic factor for overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). Adding neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is considered to have the potential to further reduce the risk of distant failure, especially in patients with extensive nodal disease, the value of NACT followed by CCRT remains controversial[8,9,10,11]. Some studies have reported that NACT may significantly decrease the risk of distant metastasis in locally advanced NPC in addition to CCRT8,12,13, but others failed to show any survival benefit[14,15]. Since the value of NACT in NPC patients with CNN has not been clearly demonstrated, we performed this retrospective study to evaluate the role of NACT followed by CCRT in this specific group of patients

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call