Abstract
Background Historically, total laryngectomy with voice-prosthesis insertion and near-total laryngectomy were the surgical options advocated for advanced supraglottic and transglottic tumors classified as T3–T4. Methods The present retrospective study reviewed our experience with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and supracricoid partial laryngectomy with cricohyoidopexy (SCPL-CHP) in a series of 60 patients with an isolated, untreated, advanced supraglottic/transglottic invasive squamous cell carcinoma classified as T3–T4. Results The Kaplan-Meier 5-year actuarial survival, local failure, nodal failure, and distant metastasis estimates were 72.7%, 8.3%, 9.2%, and 9.8%, respectively. Survival was significantly reduced in patients with nodal failure (p = .001) and distant metastasis (p = .007). Overall, a 91.7% laryngeal preservation rate and a 98.3% local control rate were achieved. Conclusion Our report was a retrospective analysis and did not present a control group exclusively managed with SCPL-CHP. Therefore, we were unable to demonstrate that the use of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy prior to SCPL-CHP allowed for an increase in local control, laryngeal preservation, and survival. However, the use of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy allowed for remobilization of a fixed arytenoid cartilage in 10 patients who thus became amenable to SCPL-CHP. The key role of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in this series was as a prognostic indicator for suitability for SCPL-CHP in the case of supraglottic–transglottic tumor with arytenoid cartilage fixation. Our data also supported the notion that SCPL-CHP is a valid alternative to total laryngectomy with voice prosthesis insertion and near-total laryngectomy in selected patients with a previously untreated supraglottic/transglottic invasive squamous cell carcinoma classified as T3–T4. Furthermore, the successful use (in terms of surgical outcome, laryngeal preservation, and survival) of SCPL-CHP after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy suggested that laryngeal organ–preservation strategies, in advanced endolaryngeal transglottic and/or supraglottic invasive squamous cell carcinoma, should not be limited to the use of laryngeal radiotherapy after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Head Neck 20: 595–599, 1998.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
