Abstract

Lower socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with higher levels of life stress, which in turn affect stress physiology. SES is related to basal cortisol and diurnal change, but it is not clear if SES is associated with cortisol reactivity to stress. To address this question, we examined the relationship between two indices of SES, parental education and concentrated neighborhood disadvantage, and the cortisol reactivity of African–American adolescents to a modified version of the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST). We found that concentrated disadvantage was associated with cortisol reactivity and this relationship was moderated by gender, such that higher concentrated disadvantage predicted higher cortisol reactivity and steeper recovery in boys but not in girls. Parental education, alone or as moderated by gender, did not predict reactivity or recovery, while neither education nor concentrated disadvantage predicted estimates of baseline cortisol. This finding is consistent with animal literature showing differential vulnerability, by gender, to the effects of adverse early experience on stress regulation and the differential effects of neighborhood disadvantage in adolescent males and females. This suggests that the mechanisms underlying SES differences in brain development and particularly reactivity to environmental stressors may vary across genders.

Highlights

  • Parental education and concentrated disadvantage were correlated (r = −0.55, p < 0.001), such that lower parental education was related to higher levels of neighborhood disadvantage

  • In all models the interaction between gender and disadvantage remained a significant predictor of reactivity and recovery. In this analysis we found that concentrated neighborhood disadvantage, but not parental education, was associated with cortisol reactivity and recovery

  • This relationship was moderated by gender, such that higher concentrated disadvantage was associated with higher cortisol reactivity and steeper recovery in boys alone

Read more

Summary

Methods

One participant did not sleep the night before the stressor protocol and was excluded from the analysis, while another was excluded because cortisol values were greater than 3 SD above the mean of the other participants on seven of nine samples. These two samples were combined, and analyses included a total of 77 participants (37 female, 48.1%) between the ages of 13 and 18 (M = 16.4, SD = 1.2). Consent was obtained from participants aged 18 and older. For participants younger than age 18 both parental or guardian consent and child assent were obtained.

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call