Abstract
In this article, I argue that Nehemiah obliquely criticizes the Achaemenid Empire’s polity over subaltern societies in Neh 5. I will first explore Homi Bhabha’s main ideas such as stereotypes, ambivalence, mimicry, and hybridity. Then, I will apply his theories to understand Nehemiah as a mimic man. Nehemiah’s hybrid identity as a Persian official and a Jew results in the mimicry of the colonized. The mimicry functions as a mockery against the Achaemenid Empire. Since Nehemiah knows the ethical statements in Darius’ testament in DNb and the Persian kings’ luxurious table, he not only appropriates the Achaemenid imperial ideology, but also criticizes the Achaemenid dynasty’s heavy taxation on the subaltern in Neh 5.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
