Abstract
By analyzing labor market description and theorizing in everyday life, the author focuses on the ways in which staff and others associated with a Work Incentive Program (WIN) use labor market descriptions to produce quasi‐theories intended to justify their positions on matters of practical concern. The major issue in dispute involved the practical effects on the recessionary area economy for WIN staff and clients. Specifically, should they be held accountable to typical organizational expectations and standards in such an economic environment? This issue is developed by considering the (1) organizational context within which labor market description and negotiations occurred, (2) images of labor markets used by WIN staff and others in justifying their positions, (3) social organization of the negotiations, and (4) ways in which such negotiations sometimes resulted in the reformulation of the “real” issues at stake in staff member interactions with others. The analysis concludes by considering some of the implications of the findings for analyzing labor market description in contemporary organizations.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.