Abstract

AbstractJurisdictions can engage in different types of aggressive tax policies to varying degrees. These policies can have negative spillover effects on other jurisdictions. In the realm of corporate taxation, these effects consist of base erosion and profit shifting and perceived pressures to reduce corporate taxes. Both direct and indirect effects undermine the efforts especially of developing countries at mobilising domestic resources to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. We analyse the intensity of corrosive tax policies by exploiting a new legal dataset compiled for the Corporate Tax Haven Index (CTHI). Relying on rigorously defined indicators, the dataset allows comparative analyses of negative and positive spillover pathways in the corporate income tax systems of 64 jurisdictions. Tax policies under review comprise, for example, preferential tax regimes, extremely low tax rates agreed through secretive tax rulings, economic zones and tax holidays. Comparing the 27 European Union (EU) member states with five African developing countries, we find important differences. Except for two indicators (loss utilisation and economic zones/tax holidays), the European Union members are found to consistently engage in more aggressive corporate tax policies than the African countries. These heightened risks for negative spillovers emanating from the EU27 corporate tax rules stand in conflict with the stated intentions by the European Union to support good governance in tax matters and its commitment to ensure policy coherence for development. The chapter provides recommendations on how to reduce the risks for negative spillovers in corporate taxation and to exit the race to the bottom in corporate taxation.

Highlights

  • Since 2011, the detrimental effects of spillovers on domestic as well as global stability have led the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to conduct extensive analysis of their widespread impact

  • For example, offers several time-bound tax holidays that reduce the statutory corporate income tax rate of 25% significantly; as such, rural banks, tree crops and venture capital financing companies are all taxed at 1% for the first 10 years, while cocoa by-production processing, fisheries and cash crops are taxed at 1% for the first 5 years

  • When a jurisdiction introduces a low statutory tax rate and restricts the scope of or inserts gaps and loopholes into its corporate tax system, it increases the likelihood of negative spillovers

Read more

Summary

10.1 Introduction1

Since 2011, the detrimental effects of spillovers on domestic as well as global stability have led the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to conduct extensive analysis of their widespread impact. By maintaining lower statutory corporate tax rates than other states, restricting the scope of or inserting gaps and loopholes into corporate tax rules, pushing down withholding rates in double tax treaties and dispensing with anti-avoidance and transparency policies, jurisdictions unwillingly enable or wittingly incite tax spillovers from other countries. Several studies have identified a range of negative spillover effects as states compete to offer lower corporate income tax rates (Devereux et al 2008; Klemm and Van Parys 2012; Crivelli et al 2016). These studies point out a discrepancy between statutory corporate tax rates and the legally documented lowest corporate tax rates available in a jurisdiction (Abbas and Klemm 2013). The steep gap between the LACIT rates of EU members and its dependencies on the one hand, and developing African countries on the other hand, suggests substantial tax spillover risks emanating from the EU’s relatively lower rates, which may entice inward profit shifting and lead to base erosion in developing countries

10.3 Loopholes and Gaps
10.3.1 Foreign Investment Income Treatment
10.3.2 Loss Utilisation
10.3.3 Capital Gains Taxation
10.3.4 Sectoral Exemptions
10.3.5 Tax Holidays and Economic Zones
10.3.6 Patent Boxes
10.3.7 Fictional Interest Deduction
Findings
10.4 Conclusions and Recommendations
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.