Abstract

We take up three Negative Sensitive Items (NSIs) in Japanese, Wh-MO plain negative indefinites, exceptive XP-sika, and certain minimizing indefinites, such as rokuna N (‘any decent N’). Although these three NSIs behave differently, we demonstrate that the two traditional NSI categories of Negative Concord Items (NCIs) and Negative Polarity Items (NPIs) are sufficient for characterizing these items. We argue that Wh-MO and XP-sika are NCIs, thus they contain a neg feature ([uneg]) which enters into (upward) agreement with its corresponding an uninterpretable feature ([ineg]). The third NSI, rokuna N, is an NPI. Two issues arise with XP-sika. First, it has an inherent focus feature, which distinguishes it from the other two. Second, this focus feature is syntactically active – meaning that movement is forced – only for the argument XP-sika. We argue that these properties of XP-sika associated with focus are independent of NP-sika as an NSI, and should be dealt with as an overall property of Japanese being a discourse configurational language. We introduce a case-theoretic solution to how focus becomes syntactically active solely with argument XP-sika.

Highlights

  • In this paper we will investigate the distributional differences of three kinds of negative sensitive items (NSIs) in Japanese

  • We take up three Negative Sensitive Items (NSIs) in Japanese, Wh-MO plain negative indefinites, exceptive XP-sika, and certain minimizing indefinites, such as rokuna N (‘any decent N’). These three NSIs behave differently, we demonstrate that the two traditional NSI categories of Negative Concord Items (NCIs) and Negative Polarity Items (NPIs) are sufficient for characterizing these items

  • If we are to use the categorization in Miyagawa, Nishioka, and Zeijlstra based on the above observation, argument XP-sika should be considered an NPI, while adjunct XP-sika should be an NCI

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In this paper we will investigate the distributional differences of three kinds of negative sensitive items (NSIs) in Japanese. Miyagawa et al: Negative sensitive items and the discourse-configurational nature of Japanese These expressions share the property of being NSIs, their syntactic distributions differ significantly. As we will review below, Miyagawa, Nishioka, and Zeijlstra (2013) conclude, based on these three properties, that these NSIs can be divided into two different classes of Negative Concord Items (NCIs) (Wh-MO) and Negative Polarity Items (NPIs), and the latter further into inherently focused NPI (NP-sika) and optionally focused NPI (rokuna N). We will review Miyagawa, Nishioka, and Zeijlstra’s (2013) classification of Japanese NSIs, based on three different syntactic properties: (i) whether the expression can occur vP-internally (2.1), (ii) whether it can occur in fragment answers (2.2), and (iii) whether there could be multiple occurrences of the same expression in a simple clause (2.3)

Occurrence inside the vP
Fragment answers
Multiple occurrences
Kumamoto Japanese: new evidence
The licensing mechanism of NCIs and other assumptions
A: Kimi-wa maisyuu takusan-no dorama-o miru no?
A: Kimi-wa nan-nin-no gakusei-o yatotta no?
A: Kimi-wa nando
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call