Abstract

The recent implementation of negative interest rates (NIR) by central and commercial banks invites empirical scrutiny of how people would react to this atypical financial policy where one has to pay to let money in the bank. Economic thinking on this issue posits that people would not tolerate NIR on their deposits, and would instead be motivated to spend or invest their money. In two experiments, we find that people, when the alternative is to take one’s savings out of the bank, show a large tolerance to NIR. This tolerance fluctuates as a function of the size of one’s savings (less tolerance for higher amounts), size of NIR (less tolerance for more negative rates), age (older people are less tolerant of NIR) and risk-taking inclinations (those that are more risk-seeking show less tolerance of NIR). The findings are discussed with regards to economic assumptions associated with NIR policy implementation and the psychological implications of this decision-making context.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.