Abstract

Those experiencing hearing loss face severe challenges in perceiving speech in noisy situations such as a busy restaurant or cafe. There are many factors contributing to this deficit including decreased audibility, reduced frequency resolution, and decline in temporal synchrony across the auditory system. Some hearing assistive devices implement beamforming in which multiple microphones are used in combination to attenuate surrounding noise while the target speaker is left unattenuated. In increasingly challenging auditory environments, more complex beamforming algorithms are required, which increases the processing time needed to provide a useful signal-to-noise ratio of the target speech. This study investigated whether the benefits from signal enhancement from beamforming are outweighed by the negative impacts on perception from an increase in latency between the direct acoustic signal and the digitally enhanced signal. The hypothesis for this study is that an increase in latency between the two identical speech signals would decrease intelligibility of the speech signal. Using 3 gain / latency pairs from a beamforming simulation previously completed in lab, perceptual thresholds of SNR from a simulated use case were obtained from normal hearing participants. No significant differences were detected between the 3 conditions. When presented with 2 copies of the same speech signal presented at varying gain / latency pairs in a noisy environment, any negative intelligibility effects from latency are masked by the noise. These results allow for more lenient restrictions for limiting processing delays in hearing assistive devices.

Highlights

  • While hearing assistive devices prove useful in quiet situations, such as one-on-one conversations in a quiet room or watching television, they can fail to provide a significant intelligibility benefit in everyday situations such as a busy cafe, restaurant, or street corner

  • Given that increased signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) comes at the cost of latency, the question becomes: is the benefit of the enhancement worth the impact of latency? In other words, are there negative impacts on intelligibility that outweigh the benefits provided by the beamformer? This study aimed to investigate how certain gain / latency pairs from simulated beamformers impact the intelligibility of speech in noise

  • The results of this study show no significant difference in intelligibility between the 3 gain / latency conditions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

While hearing assistive devices prove useful in quiet situations, such as one-on-one conversations in a quiet room or watching television, they can fail to provide a significant intelligibility benefit in everyday situations such as a busy cafe, restaurant, or street corner Such scenes often contain multiple auditory objects (multiple talkers, music, traffic, etc.) that are competing for the auditory system’s attention. Spatial hearing tends to decline in association with presbycusis [4] The summation of these deficits can make it extremely challenging for someone experiencing hearing loss to correctly perceive speech, especially in noisy environments, and there is little evidence suggesting that hearing aids can fully address these issues

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call