Abstract

Businesses in technical bankruptcy are part of the European context, many of them in such financial distress that they have lost all their equity and a very high percentage of them have even incurred negative equity. There is a very little literature analysing these companies; moreover, they are considered as out of the ordinary because they do not fit into conventional theories of business, and are removed from most samples. They are largely neglected. The research questions posed here are a step towards remedying this: “What are the scale and the economic impact of negative equity companies in terms of risk transference?”, “Does this problem differ from one European country to another?”, “Is it an effect of the crisis?”. Using the Bureau Van Dijk’s Amadeus database, we find that nearly 20% of companies have negative equity. Such companies handle more than one billion Euros, i.e. nearly 10% of European GDP. So the results suggest that negative equity companies have a high weight in Europe and, based on the country cluster studied, it seems that neither culture nor geographical area is determinant in explaining their distribution across countries. Nor is the crisis a determinant in explaining their existence, so the problem is not cyclical but structural. These findings have potentially important implications in encouraging European decision makers to factor such companies into their policies and to include them in economic models.

Highlights

  • The world’s leading economies are striving to become more competitive so that they can all get onto the path of sustainable growth and into a new economic cycle

  • We focus our study on the economic viewpoint, in a European analysis based on number of companies and volume of negative equity data, country differentiation and crisis effect

  • The first is concerned with scale; the number of companies with negative equity and the volume of that equity has a negative impact on the economy

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The world’s leading economies are striving to become more competitive so that they can all get onto the path of sustainable growth and into a new economic cycle. There are companies whose future viability is uncertain and whose ability to compete is highly limited. These companies may transfer risks, and losses should they go under, to others with which they maintain trading and other links. They have been described as “zombie companies” (Ahearne and Shinada 2005; Caballero et al 2008). The research questions posed here are a step towards remedying this: “What are the scale and the economic impact of negative equity companies in terms of risk transference?” “Does this problem differ from one European country to another?” “Is it an effect of the crisis?”

Research question and structure
Theoretical foundations
Does the pattern differ across Europe?
Is this problem related to the crisis?
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call