Abstract

ABSTRACT Critics have interpreted Clarissa Dalloway as an ontologically complete character who can be divided into private and public sides: the former is thought and kept to herself while the latter presents an exterior view of her to the members of the British elite with whom she associates. I take issue with this private/public split, however, and argue that, even in her thoughts, Clarissa never finds a permanent reprieve from the Victorian gender norms that are impressed upon her because her interiority is defined by the dialectical movement between her Victorian and anti-Victorian persuasions. I further contend that Woolf never provides a resolution to this dialectic, making it negative rather than affirmative, and thus reveals how she more generally felt about interwar women: as indefinitely between gaining full ownership of the newly won “rooms of their own” and forfeiting them in favour of a return to traditional Victorian mores.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.