Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessNegative and Positive PositivismJules L. ColemanJules L. Coleman Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Legal Studies Volume 11, Number 1Jan., 1982 Sponsored by The University of Chicago Law School Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/467696 Views: 168Total views on this site Citations: 53Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1982 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Dimitrios Kyritsis “Semantic Sting” Controversy, (Dec 2021): 1–6.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_212-1Yezid Carrillo de la Rosa, Joe Caballero Hernández Positivismo jurídico, Prolegómenos 24, no.4848 (Dec 2021): 13–22.https://doi.org/10.18359/prole.4168Jeffrey Kaplan In Defense of Hart’s Supposedly Refuted Theory of Rules, Ratio Juris 34, no.44 (Feb 2022): 331–355.https://doi.org/10.1111/raju.12331Dan Priel Bentham’s Public Utilitarianism and Its Jurisprudential Significance, Ratio Juris 34, no.44 (Feb 2022): 415–437.https://doi.org/10.1111/raju.12334Sari Kisilevsky Hard Cases and Legal Validity: The Internal Moral Significance of Law, (Sep 2021): 197–223.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78803-2_12Samuele Chilovi Grounding-based formulations of legal positivism, Philosophical Studies 177, no.1111 (Nov 2019): 3283–3302.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-019-01370-5Kenneth M. Ehrenberg Exclusive Legal Positivism, (May 2020): 1–4.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_111-2Yahya Berkol GÜLGEÇ HUKUK TEORİLERİNDE YARGI VE HUKUK UYGULAYICISI FETİŞİZMİ, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi (Dec 2019).https://doi.org/10.33717/deuhfd.644280Rodrigo E. Sánchez Brigido Cooperative Conventions, Rules of Recognition and Institutional Practices, (Dec 2018): 109–126.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03571-6_7Federico José Arena Conventionalism Unchained and Sceptical. A Defence of a Quasi-Realist Account of Legal Statements Against Dworkin’s Criticisms, (Dec 2018): 147–178.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03571-6_9Dennis Patterson Theoretical Disagreement, Legal Positivism, and Interpretation, Ratio Juris 31, no.33 (Sep 2018): 260–275.https://doi.org/10.1111/raju.12216Stephan Kirste Concept and Validity of Law, (Dec 2018): 47–73.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77522-7_3Dennis Patterson Theoretical Disagreement, Legal Positivism, and Interpretation, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2018).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3247024Valeria Giordano Constitutionalism and Value-Free Method: Kelsen’s Legacy in Contemporary Challenges, (May 2017): 99–118.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51817-6_6Federico José Arena Legal Conventionalism, (Sep 2017): 1–8.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_101-1Tom Campbell Law and Morality: An Analytical Perspective, (Jan 2015): 483–488.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.63044-1Brian Z. Tamanaha Legal Positivism, (Jan 2015): 762–766.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.86074-2Adam Dyrda , Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej ( 2015): 14.https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2015.1.14Giorgio Pino Positivism, Legal Validity, and the Separation of Law and Morals, Ratio Juris 27, no.22 (May 2014): 190–217.https://doi.org/10.1111/raju.12044Randall S. Firestone Why the Bible Cannot and Should Not Be Taken Literally, Open Journal of Philosophy 04, no.0303 (Jan 2014): 303–318.https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2014.43035Hugo Hardy Bentham, père du positivisme juridique?, Revue d’études benthamiennes , no.1111 (Oct 2012).https://doi.org/10.4000/etudes-benthamiennes.630Urszula Anna Kosielińska-Grabowska The Rule of Recognition – a Remedy for the External Uncertainty of Law?, Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej (Mar 2012): 23–33.https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2012.1.23Arthur Ripstein Self-certification and the Moral Aims of the Law, Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence 25, no.11 (Jul 2015): 201–217.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0841820900005415Giorgio Pino Positivism, Legal Validity, and the Separation of Law and Morals, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2012).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2205561SVEIN ENG Lost in the System or Lost in Translation? The Exchanges between Hart and Ross*, Ratio Juris 24, no.22 (May 2011): 194–246.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.2011.00482.xAnthony R. Reeves Judicial Practical Reason: Judges in Morally Imperfect Legal Orders, Law and Philosophy 30, no.33 (Mar 2011): 319–352.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-011-9098-xGerald J. Postema The Incorporation Debate, (Jun 2011): 457–482.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8960-1_10Gerald J. Postema Conventions and The Foundations of Law, (Jun 2011): 483–545.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8960-1_11Gerald J. Postema Positivism Challenged: Interpretation, Integrity, and Law, (Jun 2011): 401–456.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8960-1_9Subrata Kumar Kundu Re-Visiting the Viability of the Rule of Recognition and the Basic Norm in Modern Legal Context, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2011).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1866863MATTHEW GRELLETTE Legal Positivism and the Separation of Existence and Validity, Ratio Juris 23, no.11 (Mar 2010): 22–40.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.2009.00442.xJules L. Coleman, Brian Leiter Legal Positivism, (Jan 2010): 228–248.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444320114.ch14Ken Kress Coherence, (Jan 2010): 521–538.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444320114.ch36JULES L. COLEMAN Beyond Inclusive Legal Positivism*, Ratio Juris 22, no.33 (Sep 2009): 359–394.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.2009.00430.xGIOVANNI SARTOR Legality Policies and Theories of Legality: From Bananas to Radbruch's Formula*, Ratio Juris 22, no.22 (Jun 2009): 218–243.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.2009.00422.xMICHAEL GIUDICE The Regular Practice of Morality in Law, Ratio Juris 21, no.11 (Mar 2008): 94–106.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.2007.00381.xMark C. Murphy Natural Law Theory, (Feb 2008): 15–28.https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470690116.ch1Brian H. Bix Legal Positivism, (Feb 2008): 29–49.https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470690116.ch2Stefano Bertea Towards A New Paradigm of Legal Certainty, Legisprudence 2, no.11 (May 2015): 25–45.https://doi.org/10.1080/17521467.2008.11424672Yu Xingzhong Formalism and Commitment in Hong Kong’s Constitutional Development, (Jan 2007): 183–197.https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230610361_10M. N. S. Sellers The Actual Validity of Law, (Jan 2003): 56–61.https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230513402_7T. Campbell Law and Morality: An Analytic Perspective, (Jan 2001): 8469–8475.https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/01050-0B.Z. Tamanaha Legal Positivism, (Jan 2001): 8654–8660.https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/02922-3Jules L. Coleman Incorporationism, Conventionality, and the Practical Difference Thesis, Legal Theory 4, no.44 (Feb 2009): 381–425.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352325200001099Philip Soper Two Puzzles from the Postscript, Legal Theory 4, no.33 (Feb 2009): 359–380.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352325200001063Alan R. Madry, Joel F. Richeimer The Possibility of Normative Jurisprudence: A Response to Brian Leiter, Legal Theory 4, no.22 (Feb 2009): 207–239.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352325200000987Brian Bix Conceptual Questions and Jurisprudence, Legal Theory 1, no.44 (Feb 2009): 465–479.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352325200000215Mark J. Osiel Dialogue with Dictators: Judicial Resistance in Argentina and Brazil, Law & Social Inquiry 20, no.0202 (Dec 2018): 481–560.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.1995.tb01069.xBrenda M. Baker Empire-Building, Dialogue 32, no.11 (Apr 2010): 149–162.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012217300015055Charles Silver Public Choice and Judicial Review, Law <html_ent glyph="@amp;" ascii="&"/> Social Inquiry 18, no.11 (Jan 1993): 165–195.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.1993.tb00651.xBernd Gräfrath Ausgewählte Literatur, (Jan 1991): 199–212.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-03347-5_10 Ken Kress The Interpretive Turn, Ethics 97, no.44 (Oct 2015): 834–860.https://doi.org/10.1086/292897Yechiel Michael Barilan Jewish Bioethics, vol. 3 (Dec 2013).https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139175890

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.