Abstract

The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has a dominant oil sector. It is assumed that enormous oil revenues put a curse of poor economic growth in predominantly natural resource based economy and the country becomes a rentier state. The study attempts to estimate the relationship between economic growth, oil rents and institutional quality. The study finds a cointegrating relationship between the variables. The study argues that the country is not experiencing the phenomenon of resource curse as oil rents are not negatively impacting economic growth in the long run. Using non linear ARDL method the study reports a higher rate of growth to a positive shock in oil rents as compare to negative shocks in oil rents. This hints at the resilience of the country as the country's growth rate is less effected with the fall in oil rents. It is also assumed that mere rent seeking economies tend to have poor quality of institutions. The study finds no significant relationship between institutional quality and the rate of growth for the country. Finally, the study recommends increasing the level of economic diversification and developing the quality of institutions.Keywords: Rentier state, Resource curse, Oil rents, Institutional quality, Asymmetric relationship.JEL Classifications: Q30 O43, O53DOI: https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.9870

Highlights

  • The proponents of Rentier State Theory, Mahdavy (1970) and Beblawi and Luciani (1987) referred to those economies as rentier states which collect considerable quantity of external rents regularly which obliterate the need to make the domestic sector productive

  • This study aims to fill the literature gap by studying the relationship between economic growth, oil rents and institutional quality for Saudi Arabia

  • This study finds a cointegration relationship between economic growth, oil rents and institution quality over the period 19842016 for a primarily oil producing country

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The proponents of Rentier State Theory, Mahdavy (1970) and Beblawi and Luciani (1987) referred to those economies as rentier states which collect considerable quantity of external rents regularly which obliterate the need to make the domestic sector productive. In such economies a minute percentage of the population works to generate the rent as compared to the greater portion of population occupied to distribute and utilize the rent. Periods of boom in rentier states results in poor financial discipline and non-competitiveness in the non-oil sector which leads to fragile institutions (Kar, 1997) This is a sense is a curse on resource rich economies

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call