Abstract

This article examines a series of ambiguities and apparent contradictions surrounding a copyright lawsuit over the song “Mühür Gözlüm,” penned by Turkish singer-poet Ali İzzet Özkan but reinvented and popularized by another famous performer, Neşet Ertaş. It argues that these ambiguities emerge because of how Ertaş engaged with a series of institutions: rural traditions, state folklore, and copyright. These institutions enact distinct music ontologies that sometimes overlap and sometimes clash. This account highlights Ertaş’s agency in navigating this complex situation, thereby clarifying how individuals negotiate the kinds of ontological pluralism that often emerge in (post) colonial or modernizing contexts.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.